Bombay High Court
RATANCHAND HIRALAL SHAH DIED THR LRS KISHOR AND ORSversusRADHESHAM BABULAL AGRAWAL AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
- Bench
- ABHAY MANTRI
Holding
The application is allowed; the delay is condoned and the abatement order is set aside.
Summary
The legal heirs of the deceased Ratanchand Hiralal Shah filed an application seeking condonation of a 576‑day delay in having their names entered as legal heirs and to set aside an abatement order that had been passed. The respondents (Radhesham Babulal Agrawal and others) raised no objection to the relief sought. The Court examined the reasons for the delay and, noting the lack of opposition, decided to condone the delay and set aside any abatement order. Consequently, the heirs were permitted to amend the petition to record themselves as legal representatives within a stipulated time. Failure to amend would result in dismissal of the petition.
Issues considered
- Whether a delay of 576 days in recording the names of legal heirs can be condoned under the Civil Procedure Code.
- Whether the abatement order, if any, should be set aside.
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- legal heirs
- abatement order
- amendment of petition
- civil procedure
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:34109
(1) 918ca8486.26.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
918 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8486 OF 2026
IN WP/8774/2016
Ratanchand Hiralal Shah Died Thr Lrs Kishor And Ors
.....Petitioner
VERSUS
Radhesham Babulal Agrawal And Others
.....Respondent
Mr. P. P. Patini, Advocate h/f Mr. P. F. Patni, Advocate for the
Applicant
Mr. Umesh Mitkari, Advocate h/f Mr. Mukul Kulkarni, Advocate for
the Respondent No. 1
Mr. Harshvardhan A. Karad, Advocate h/f Mr. V. D. Hon, Advocate
for the Respondent No. 2
CORAM : ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.
DATE : 06th AUGUST, 2026
PER COURT :
1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant and
Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. None for the Respondent No. 3, though
served. Perused the record.
2. The Applicants, i.e. legal heirs of the Petitioner, have
moved this Application for condoning the delay of 576 days for
bringing their names on record as legal heirs of the Petitioner and
setting aside the abatement order, if any.
1 of 2
(2) 918ca8486.26.odt
3. It is pertinent to note that the learned Advocate for the
Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and learned AGP have no objection to
allowing the Application.
4. Having considered the no objections as well as reasons
disclosed in para 2 to 4 of the Application, I deem it appropriate to
allow the Application.
5. Consequently, the Application is allowed in terms of
prayer clauses-(B)(C) & (D). The delay is condoned.
6. The abatement order, if any, is set aside.
7. The Applicants are permitted to bring their names on
record as legal representatives of the Petitioner.
8. Amendment be carried out within a week, and a copy of
the same be supplied to the Court as well as the other side within one
week thereafter; failing to carry out the amendment, the Petition shall
stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.
[ABHAY J. MANTRI, J. ]
VishalK/918ca8486.26.odt
2 of 2
Checking your session…