Bombay High Court
BHAURAO BALI RANKHAMB DIED THR LRS KASTURBAI AND ANR.versusTHE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR (EARTHQUAKE).
- Disposal
- Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
- Bench
- NEERAJ P DHOTE
Holding
The application for condonation of delay was dismissed as the X‑objection was filed within time.
Summary
The applicant filed an application seeking condonation of delay in filing an X‑objection to the State's first appeal. The court examined the office note, which indicated that the X‑objection had been filed within the prescribed time limit. Since there was no delay, the ground for condonation did not arise. Consequently, the court held that the application could not be entertained. The application was therefore disposed of, and the X‑objection was ordered to be tagged with the first appeal.
Issues considered
- Whether the X‑objection was filed within the time prescribed, thereby negating the need for condonation of delay
- Whether the application for condonation of delay should be entertained
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- X‑objection
- first appeal
- civil procedure
- High Court
Judgment
929ca8586-26
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8586 OF 2026
IN X-OBJ/275/2026
Bhaurao Bali Rankhamb Died Thr Lrs Kasturbai And Anr.
VERSUS
The Special Land Acquisition Officer And Additional Collector
(earthquake).
...
Mr. Patil Shashikiran N, Advocate for Applicant
Mrs. Bharti B. Gunjal, AGP for the Respondents-State
CORAM : NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.
Dated : 6th August, 2026
PER COURT :-
1. This is an Application for condonation delay caused in
preferring X-Objection by the Claimant in the First Appeal preferred by
the State.
2. The office note shows that, the X-objection is filed within time.
Consequently, the application does not survive for consideration and
stands disposed of.
3. X-objection be tagged with the First Appeal.
( NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.)
JPChavan
1 of 1
Checking your session…