Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

BALAJI SKHAHARI KENDREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ORS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The court held that the sought amendment of the writ petitions was permissible and ordered the petitioners to file the amended copies within one week.

Summary

The petitioners Shivaji Ramrao Karale and Balaji Sakhaari Kendre, along with others, filed civil applications (Nos. 8903‑8906) seeking amendment of their writ petitions against the State of Maharashtra. The applications argued that amendment was necessary to correct or clarify their pleadings. The State, represented by its Advocate‑General, opposed the amendments. A two‑judge bench of Justice Nitin B. Suryawanshi and Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde allowed the applications in accordance with prayer clause ‘B’, directing that the amended copies be filed within one week and served on the opposite side. The court then disposed of the civil applications.

Subjects

  • amendment of pleadings
  • civil application
  • writ petition
  • procedural law
  • High Court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:36811-DB
                                               1                      29,30.doc



                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD
                        29 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8903 OF 2026
                                   IN WP/4587/2026
                        SHIVAJI RAMRAO KARALE
                                VERSUS
   THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ORS
                                         ...


                                        WITH
                         CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8904 OF 2026
                                  IN WP/4587/2026

                                         ...
              Advocate for the Applicant : Mr. Dhongade Anilkumar B.
                      AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. V.M. Kagne
         Advocate for Respondent No.2 and 3 in both CA : Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar
                                         …
                      30 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8905 OF 2026
                                 IN WP/4571/2026

                   BALAJI SAKHAHARI KENDRE AND OTHERS
                                 VERSUS
        THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ORS
                                         ...

                                       WITH
                       CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8906 OF 2026
                                 IN WP/4571/2026
                                         …
              Advocate for the Applicant : Mr. Dhongade Anilkumar B.
                      AGP for Respondent/State : Mr. N.D. Batule
         Advocate for Respondent No.2 and 3 in both CA : Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar
                                         …
                                        CORAM      : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
                                                     ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
                                         DATE      : 14.08.2026
                                  2                          29,30.doc



PER COURT :
.       For the reasons stated in the applications, the same are allowed
in terms of prayer clause ‘B’. Necessary amendment be carried out
within a period of one (01) week. Amended copy be served on the
other side. Civil Applications are accordingly, stands disposed of.




( ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. )               ( NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J. )



vsj..


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.