Bombay High Court
JAHURABEE JAHARALI ALIAS ZOHARA BI ZAHOOR ALI KAZI DIED THR LIYAKAT DIED THR AZHARALI AND OTHERSversusRAHEMANKHA AMEENKHA PATHAN LRS AMEERBEE AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- APPLICATION ALLOWED
Holding
The Court condoned the 456‑day delay, set aside the abatement and allowed the legal representatives of appellant No.1 to be placed on record.
Summary
The petitioners filed an application seeking condonation of a 456‑day delay in filing a suit to set aside an abatement and to bring the legal representatives of appellant No.1 on record. The respondents opposed, arguing that the delay could not be condoned under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The Court examined the grounds and found that the delay was not deliberately caused and that condoning it would serve the interests of justice. Accordingly, the Court condoned the delay, set aside the abatement, and granted permission to amend the pleadings to include the legal representatives within two weeks, subject to costs. The matter was listed for further hearing on 12 October 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether a delay of 456 days in filing the application for setting aside the abatement can be condoned under Section 5 of the Limitation Act
Legislation cited
- Limitation Act — s. 5
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- Limitation Act
- Section 5
- abatement
- legal representatives
- High Court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:44078
(1) 66 ca 9096.26
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
66 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9096 OF 2026
IN SA/251/1995
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5232 OF 1998
IN SA/251/1995
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4328 OF 1995
IN SA/251/1995
JAHURABEE JAHARALI ALIAS ZOHARA BI ZAHOOR ALI KAZI DIED THR
LIYAKAT DIED THR AZHARALI AND OTHERS
VERSUS
RAHEMANKHA AMEENKHA PATHAN LRS AMEERBEE AND OTHERS
…..
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Temak Rahul Bhausaheb
Advocate for Respondents : Mr. Girish Rane
…..
CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : 28.09.2026
P.C.:-
1. This is an application for condonation of delay of 456 days caused
in filing the application for setting aside the abatement and for bringing the
legal representatives of appellant no.1 on record.
2. Perused the application. Heard the learned advocates for both the
sides
3. The learned advocate for the respondents strongly opposed the
application and submitted that there is no sufficient cause to condone the
(2) 66 ca 9096.26
delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. He further submitted that, if this
aspect is taken into consideration, the application deserves to be rejected.
4. On perusal of application and the grounds stated in the
application, it appears that the delay has not been deliberately caused and the
same deserves to be condoned, the delay of 456 days stands condoned. The
application stands allowed in the interest of justice. Abatement is set aside
and permission for bringing the legal representatives of appellant no.1 on
record is granted. Amendment be carried out within two weeks from today. If
the amendment is not carried out within two weeks, the applicants shall be
liable to pay/deposit costs of Rs.2,000/- with the High Court Legal Services
Sub-Committee, Aurangabad.
5. Place the appeal on 12.10.2026 at 10.30 a.m. first on board.
[SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.]
mubashir
Checking your session…