Bombay High Court
GUNDU LAXMAN WAGHMODE DIED THROUGH LEGAL REPR. SHILABAI AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS.
- Disposal
- Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Holding
The claimants are permitted to withdraw 80% of the compensation with accrued interest upon furnishing a satisfactory undertaking, with the balance to be invested in a nationalized bank.
Summary
The claimants filed a civil application seeking withdrawal of the amount deposited by the acquiring body as compensation. They argued that other claimants from the same project had been allowed to withdraw 80% of their deposited amounts, and thus they should be granted the same. The court noted that the acquiring body did not dispute this position and that the earlier order permitting 80% withdrawal for other claimants was annexed to the present application. Accordingly, the court allowed the application, directing that the claimants may withdraw 80% of the compensation with accrued interest upon furnishing a satisfactory undertaking, while the balance must be invested in a nationalized bank. The civil application was then disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether the claimants are entitled to withdraw 80% of the compensation deposited by the acquiring body, similar to other claimants from the same project.
Subjects
- compensation
- withdrawal
- civil application
- interest
- bank investment
- acquiring body
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:39538
1 933-CA.9159-26.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
933 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9159 OF 2026
IN FA/2000/2024
GUNDU LAXMAN WAGHMODE DIED THROUGH LEGAL REPR.
SHILABAI AND ORS.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR,
OSMANABAD AND ORS.
...
Advocate for Applicant : Ms. Bhagyashri Kamble h/f Mr. G. K.
Sontakke And Mrs. P. G. Sontakke Patil.
AGP for Respondent/s-State : Ms. Dr. Kalpalata Patil
Bharaswadkar.
Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. Avishkar S. Shelke.
...
CORAM : MANJUSHA A. DESHPANDE, J.
DATE : 29.08.2026
PER COURT :-
1. The application is filed by the claimant for withdrawal of
amount deposited by the acquiring body. The first appeal is
already admitted. Pursuant to the order passed by this Court,
the entire amount has been deposited since application is filed
by the claimants for withdrawal of amount. It is submitted
that the other claimants from the same project have already
been permitted to withdraw 80% of the amount deposited by
the acquiring body. Thus, it is submitted that the claimants may
also be allowed to withdraw similar amount. The order passed
by this Court in respect of other claimants is annexed to the
2 933-CA.9159-26.odt
application. This position is not disputed by the learned
advocate appearing for the acquiring body.
2. In view thereof, civil application is allowed.
3. The claimants are permitted to withdraw 80% of the
amount of compensation with accrued interest on furnishing
undertaking to the satisfaction of the Registrar (Judicial) of
this Court and balance amount shall be invested in any
nationalized bank.
4. With the afore mentioned observation, civil application is
disposed of.
(MANJUSHA A. DESHPANDE, J.)
...
vmk/-
Checking your session…