Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

LINGU GANPAT GHANTEWADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The delay is condoned subject to deposit of Rs.1,000 costs and removal of office objections within the stipulated time.

Summary

Ling... Ghantewad filed a writ petition (WP/15057/2023) challenging a decision of the State of Maharashtra. The petition was delayed, prompting the filing of a civil application seeking condonation of the delay. The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, examined whether the delay could be condoned and what conditions, if any, should be imposed. The Court held that the delay could be condoned provided the applicant deposited costs of Rs.1,000 with the Advocates’ Association within 15 days. Upon payment of the costs, the writ petition was restored, subject to the removal of office objections within two weeks. The civil application was thereafter disposed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the delay in filing the writ petition can be condoned
  • Whether the court may impose a cost order as a condition for condonation
  • Whether the writ petition can be restored subject to removal of objections

Subjects

  • delay condonation
  • writ petition
  • costs order
  • civil application
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:36642-DB
                                                 1                             CA.9197.26.odt

                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9197 OF 2026
                                         IN WP/15057/2023

                                     LINGU GANPAT GHANTEWAD
                                               VERSUS
                              THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH
                               ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS
                                                  ...
                              Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Rahul S. Pawar
                            AGP for Respondent/State : Ms. Neha B. Kamble
                       Advocate for Respondent Nos.5 and 6 : Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar
                                                  ...

                                      CORAM          : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
                                                       ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.


                                      DATE           : 14.08.2026

             PER COURT:

             1.              Not on board. Upon mentioning taken on board.

             2.              For the reasons stated in the Civil Application, the delay is

             condoned, subject to deposit of costs of Rs.1,000/- (Rupees One

             thousand only) within a period of 15 days with Advocates’ Association

             of Bombay High Court, Bench at Aurangabad. The writ petition is

             restored, subject to removal of office objections within a period of two

             weeks after deposit of the said costs. Civil application is disposed of.



             (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.)                     (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)

             habeeb/


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.