Bombay High Court
PETER PAUL MASCARENHAS AND 7 ORSversusDASHRATH ALIAS DASRATH SHRIKANT REVODKARAND 2 ORS
- Disposal
- Disposed of
Holding
The court held that the Consent Terms are fair and binding, and the appeal is disposed of in accordance with those terms.
Summary
The appellants and respondents filed mutually agreed Consent Terms to settle the pending civil suit and the present appeal. The court examined the Consent Terms, which provided for impleading certain legal representatives, setting aside the earlier abatement of non-impleadment, and executing a deed of conveyance in favour of a newly impleaded respondent. The court found the terms to be fair, free of coercion, and consistent with procedural requirements. Accordingly, the court ordered that the Consent Terms be filed with the appellate court and that a decree be passed based on them. The appeal was consequently disposed of, and the parties were directed to seek mutation of the land within stipulated timeframes.
Issues considered
- Whether the Consent Terms filed by the parties can be approved by the court and form the basis for disposing the appeal
- Whether the abatement of non-impleadment of certain legal representatives can be set aside under the Consent Terms
- Whether the execution of a deed of conveyance and subsequent mutation of land can proceed pursuant to the court's decree
Subjects
- consent terms
- civil appeal
- settlement
- impleadment
- deed of conveyance
- mutation
- court decree
Judgment
25 CA 92 2026
Meena
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.92 OF 2026
WITH
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.38 OF 2026
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.92 OF 2026
PETER PAUL MASCARENHAS AND 7 ORS ... APPLICANTS
Versus
DASHRATH ALIAS DASRATH SHRIKANT
REVODKARAND 2 ORS ... RESPONDENTS
WITH
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.38 OF 2026
PETER PAUL MASCARENHAS AND 7 ORS ... APPELLANTS
Versus
DASHRATH ALIAS DASRATH SHRIKANT
REVODKAR AND 2 ORS ... RESPONDENTS
Mr S.M. Singbal, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr J. J. Mulgaonkar with Ms Divyabharati Naidu, Advocates for
Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
CORAM:- VALMIKI MENEZES, J.
DATED :- 4th September, 2026
P.C.:
1. The parties to this Appeal have filed Consent Terms which are
duly signed by them. The Appellants are represented by their
Attorney, Mr Michael Mascarenhas, who is present in the Court.
The Power of Attorney is on record along with Vakalatnama of the
Counsel for the Appellants. Clause 2 of the Power of Attorney
empowers the agent to enter into Consent Terms and settle the
matter.
Page 1 of 3
4th September, 2026
25 CA 92 2026
2. Besides the Attorney of the Appellants, Mr Dashrath Revodkar
and Mrs Dayavati Rivodkar are present in the Court. All parties
have acknowledged their signature on the Consent Terms and have
stated that they have understood the terms and signed the same free
from any coercion.
3. According to the Consent Terms the parties have agreed that the
legal representatives of the Appellant Nos.5 and 6 would be
impleaded and brought on record before the Appellate Court in
Regular Civil Suit No.105/2023 which is pending before the Adhoc
District Judge-I, Panaji and the abatement of the Appellants with
respect to the non-impleadment of the legal representatives of the
deceased Appellant Nos.3, 5 and 6 therein would be set aside.
4. The Consent Terms further record that the son of the Respondent
Nos.1 and 2, Vilas Dashrath Rivodkar would be impleaded as
Respondent No.4 in the said appeal and thereafter a Deed of
Conveyance would be executed by the Appellants, including the
legal representatives now to be brought on record, in favour of
Respondent No.4.
5. After considering the Consent Terms filed before me, I am of the
opinion that they are fair to all the parties and if the Consent Terms
as recorded herein are filed before the Appellate Court, and a
Page 2 of 3
4th September, 2026
25 CA 92 2026
decree were passed in those terms, the same would be fair and
balanced to all the parties. The terms also specify the
considerations of the execution of the Deed of Sale by the
Appellants to the parties including the party to be impleaded as
Respondent of the appeal. The Consent Terms are taken on record
and marked X for identification. The appeal shall stand disposed
of in terms of these Consent Terms, which shall form part of the
record.
6. If the Consent Terms are filed by the parties before the Appellate
Court within the timeline specified or under some extended time
with their consent, the Appellate Court shall endeavour to dispose
of the appeal within two weeks thereafter. It is expected that the
concerned Mamlatdar of Bardez, in whose jurisdiction the suit land
under Survey No.582/5 of village Anjuna bearing old cadastral
Survey No.2114 is situated, would carry out the mutation on the
basis of the decree passed by the Appellate Court within a period of
two months thereafter. The parties shall file a joint application for
mutation based on the decree passed before the Mamlatdar to
enable the speedy disposal of the mutation proceedings.
7. Appeal from Order with Civil Application stand disposed of.
VALMIKI MENEZES, J.
Signed by: MEENA VISHAL BHOIR
Designation: Private Secretary
Page 3 of 3
Date: 04/09/2026 17:23:22
4th September, 2026
Checking your session…