Bombay High Court
Kishor S/o Murlidharrao Ghuge and orsversusMudidhar S/o Satwarao ghuge and ors
- Disposal
- APPLICATION ALLOWED
Holding
The court held that the ten‑day delay in filing the second appeal is condoned in the interest of justice.
Summary
The applicants filed a second appeal but missed the prescribed time limit by ten days and applied for condonation of delay. The court examined the reasons provided in the application and, considering the interest of justice, decided to condone the delay. Consequently, the application for condonation was allowed and the second appeal was registered. The court also issued a notice to the respondents, setting a return date of 15 October 2026. Additionally, the appellants were granted permission to serve the respondents by private mode alongside regular service.
Issues considered
- Whether a ten‑day delay in filing a second appeal can be condoned under the law?
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- second appeal
- service of notice
- private mode of service
- interest of justice
Judgment
1 955.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
955 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9245 OF 2025
IN SAST/22525/2025
KISHOR S/O MURLIDHARRAO GHUGE AND ORS
VERSUS
MUDIDHAR S/O SATWARAO GHUGE AND ORS
...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Shubhangi Digambar More.
...
CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : 03rd September, 2026.
P.C.:
1 This is an application for condonation of delay of 10 days caused
in filing the second appeal.
2 Heard the learned counsel for the applicants. Perused the
application.
3 For the reasons stated in the application, the delay stands
condoned. The application stands allowed in the interest of justice.
Appeal be registered.
Second Appeal :
4 Issue notice to respondents, returnable on 15th October, 2026.
5 The learned counsel for the appellants seeks leave to serve the
respondents by private mode. Leave granted. In addition to regular
mode of service, private service, as is permissible in law, is permitted.
[ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ]
nga
Checking your session…