Bombay High Court
DHANAJI GENYA GAVIT DIED THR LRS AJIT DHANAJI GAVITversusTHE SPECIAL ACQUISITION OFFICER -2 NANDURBAR
- Disposal
- ALLOWED TO BE WITHDRAWN AT ADMISSION STAGE
Holding
The court condoned the delay, quashed the Registrar’s order, and restored the first appeal and civil application subject to removal of objections within three weeks.
Summary
The applicant sought condonation of a 1,087‑day delay in filing an application for restoration of a first appeal (No. 17025 of 2023) and the accompanying civil application (No. 17026). The Registrar had rejected registration of the appeal on the ground of outstanding office objections. The court examined whether such a long delay could be condoned and whether the Registrar’s order could be set aside. Relying on procedural principles, the judge held that the delay could be condoned, quashed the Registrar’s order, and restored the appeal and civil application to their original positions, subject to the applicant removing the objections within three weeks. The court also directed that no interest be claimed for the period of delay.
Issues considered
- Whether a delay of 1,087 days in filing an application for restoration of appeal proceedings can be condoned.
- Whether the Registrar’s order rejecting registration of the appeal can be set aside.
- Whether the first appeal and the civil application can be restored despite the delay.
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- restoration of appeal
- civil procedure
- registrar order
- interest clause
- procedural law
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:37403
1
927-ca-9292-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9292 OF 2026
IN FAST/17025/2023
Dhanaji Genya Gavit Died Thr Lrs Ajit Dhanaji Gavit
VERSUS
The Special Acquisition Officer -2 Nandurbar
...
Mr. A. H. Koralkar h/f Mr. D. B. Rasve, Advocate for Applicants
Mr. A. V. Lavte, AGP for Respondent-State
Mr. S. B. Kadu i/b Mr. S. R. Patil, Advocate for Respondent
no.2
…..
CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.
DATED : 18TH AUGUST, 2026
P.C. :-
. Heard learned Advocate Mr. A. H. Koralkar h/f Mr. D.
B. Rasve for the applicant/appellant, Mr. A. V. Lavte, learned
AGP for respondent no.1 and Mr. S. B. Kadu i/b Mr. S. R.
Patil, learned Advocate for respondent no.2.
2. This application seeks condonation of delay of 1087
days caused in filing the application for restoration of the
appeal proceedings and Civil Application filed therein. For
want of removal of office objections, learned Registrar
(Judicial) of this Court vide order dated 01.08.2023 rejected
registration of First Appeal St. No.17025 of 2023 with Civil
Application St. No.17026 in First Appeal St. No.17025.
2
927-ca-9292-2026
3. For the reasons mentioned in the application, Civil
Application deserves to be allowed. Hence, the following
order:
ORDER
a. Civil Application stands allowed.
b. The delay of 1087 days caused in filing the
application for restoration stands condoned.
c. The order dated 01.08.2023, passed by
learned Registrar (Judicial) is quashed and set
aside.
d. The First Appeal St. No.17025 of 2023 with
Civil Application St. No.17026 in First Appeal St.
No.17025 are restored to their original positions
provided that the applicant removes all the office
objections within a period of three weeks from
today.
e. If the objections are not removed, this order
shall loose its effect. Thereafter no further
application be entertained for restoration of the
proceedings.
f. Learned Advocate Mr. A. H. Koralkar
further makes statement that claimant shall not
claim any interest for the delayed period.
( AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. )
Rushikesh/2026
Checking your session…