Bombay High Court
JITENDRA S/O. RAJU INGLE.versusSOU. SARITA W/O. JITENDRA INGLE AND ANR.
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The application was disposed of as there was no delay to condone.
Summary
The petitioner, Jitendra s/o Raju Ingle, filed a civil application seeking condonation of delay in a family court matter. The application alleged that procedural time limits had been missed and requested the court's indulgence. Upon review, the court noted that the office remarks accompanying the application indicated that no delay had actually occurred. Consequently, the court found no basis for granting condonation. The judges therefore ordered the application to be disposed of. No further orders were made.
Issues considered
- Whether the civil application for condonation of delay should be entertained when the office record shows no delay.
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- civil application
- procedural delay
- application disposal
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:37451-DB
9293.26CA
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
939 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9293 OF 2026
IN FCA NO. 39 OF 2026
JITENDRA S/O. RAJU INGLE.
VERSUS
SOU. SARITA W/O. JITENDRA INGLE & ANOTHER
...
Advocate for the applicant : Mr.Swapnil S.Patunkar h/f.
J.P.Legal Associates
...
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE &
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ.
DATE : 18.08.2026
P.C. :
Though the present Civil Application is filed for
condonation of delay, but office remarks indicates that there
is no delay. As such, Civil Application stands disposed of.
[VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE]
JUDGE JUDGE
DDC
Checking your session…