Bombay High Court
YASHWANT KHATRYA WASAVEversusTHE SPECIAL ACQUISITION OFFICER -2 NANDURBAR
- Disposal
- Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Holding
The Court condoned the delay, quashed the Registrar's order, and restored the appeal and civil application to their original positions.
Summary
The petitioner, Yashwant Khatrya Wasave, sought restoration of a first appeal (No. 17213 of 2023) after the Registrar of the High Court rejected its registration due to unresolved office objections. The petitioner filed a civil application for restoration after a delay of 1,087 days. The Court examined whether such a lengthy delay could be condoned and whether the Registrar's order could be set aside. Relying on the merits of the application, the Court condoned the delay, quashed the Registrar's order, and restored the appeal to its original position, subject to removal of objections within three weeks. The Court also directed that no interest be claimed for the delayed period.
Issues considered
- Whether a delay of 1,087 days in filing an application for restoration of appeal proceedings can be condoned.
- Whether the Registrar's order rejecting registration of the appeal can be set aside.
- Whether the appeal and associated civil application can be restored subject to removal of office objections.
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- restoration of appeal
- civil procedure
- registrar order
- office objections
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:37550
1
929-ca-9301-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9301 OF 2026
IN FAST/17213/2023
Yashwant Khatrya Wasave
VERSUS
The Special Acquisition Officer -2 Nandurbar
...
Mr. A. H. Koralkar h/f Mr. D. B. Rasve, Advocate for Applicants
Mr. S. P. Sonpawale, AGP for Respondent-State
Mr. S. B. Kadu i/b Mr. S. R. Patil, Advocate for Respondent
no.2
…..
CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.
DATED : 18TH AUGUST, 2026
P.C. :-
. Heard learned Advocate Mr. A. H. Koralkar h/f Mr. D.
B. Rasve for the applicant/appellant, Mr. S. P. Sonpawale,
learned AGP for respondent no.1 and Mr. S. B. Kadu i/b
Mr. S. R. Patil, learned Advocate for respondent no.2.
2. This application seeks condonation of delay of 1087
days caused in filing the application for restoration of the
appeal proceedings and Civil Application filed therein. For
want of removal of office objections, learned Registrar
(Judicial) of this Court vide order dated 01.08.2023 rejected
registration of First Appeal St. No.17213 of 2023 with Civil
Application St. No.17215 of 2023 in First Appeal St. No.17213
of 2023.
2
929-ca-9301-2026
3. For the reasons mentioned in the application, Civil
Application deserves to be allowed. Hence, the following
order:
ORDER
a. Civil Application stands allowed.
b. The delay of 1087 days caused in filing the
application for restoration stands condoned.
c. The order dated 01.08.2023, passed by
learned Registrar (Judicial) is quashed and set
aside.
d. The First Appeal St. No.17213 of 2023 with
Civil Application St. No.17215 of 2023 in First
Appeal St. No.17213 of 2023 are restored to their
original positions provided that the applicant
removes all the office objections within a period
of three weeks from today.
e. If the objections are not removed, this order
shall loose its effect. Thereafter no further
application be entertained for restoration of the
proceedings.
f. Learned Advocate Mr. A. H. Koralkar
further makes statement that claimant shall not
claim any interest for the delayed period.
( AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. )
Rushikesh/2026
Checking your session…