Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

USHABAI ANIL RATHOD AND ANRversusTHE MANAGER, SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. AND ORS

Disposal
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Holding

The court allowed the civil application under prayer clause “B” despite the non‑appearance of the served respondent.

Summary

Ushabai Anil Rathod and another filed a civil application against the Manager of Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd and others. Respondent No.3 was served but did not appear before the court. The applicant sought relief under prayer clause “B”. The bench, after noting the non‑appearance, allowed the civil application in terms of the said prayer clause and directed that the appeal be registered. No substantive merits of the dispute were discussed as the decision was based on procedural default.

Issues considered

  • Whether a civil application can be granted when a respondent has been served but fails to appear
  • Whether relief under prayer clause “B” is appropriate in the circumstances

Subjects

  • Civil Procedure Code
  • Service of notice
  • Default judgment
  • Insurance
  • Prayer clause

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:38348
                                                     1                     29-CA-9353-24.odt




                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD



                                  CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9353 OF 2024
                                           IN FAST/20256/2024

                                 USHABAI ANIL RATHOD AND ANOTHER
                                                 VERSUS
                      THE MANAGER, SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.
                                              AND OTHERS
                                                     ...
                        Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Sayyed Umair Pasha A Quader
                          Advocate for Respondents : Mr. Abhijit G. Choudhari
                                        Respondent No.3 served
                                                     ...

                                              CORAM :        SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
                                              DATE       :   21-08-2026
                PER COURT:-

                1.       Though served, none appeared for respondent No.3.

                2.       For the reasons stated in the application, the civil application

                is allowed in terms of prayeer clause “B”.        Office to registere the

                appeal.



                                                     [SACHIN S. DESHMUKH]
                                                             JUDGE

                rrd


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.