Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RAHUL DATTATRAYA AUTADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court held that amendment of the prayer clause for condonation of delay is permissible and the delay is condoned, thereby restoring the writ petition.

Summary

The petitioner, Rahul Dattatraya Autade, filed a civil application seeking leave to correct and amend the prayer clause of his writ petition to include a request for condonation of delay. The petitioner’s counsel, Shubham Pawar, argued that the amendment was necessary to address procedural deficiencies. The Court examined whether the amendment of a prayer clause for condonation of delay is permissible under procedural law. It granted leave to amend the prayer clause and subsequently condoned the delay, finding no substantive prejudice. Accordingly, the Court allowed the application, restored the writ petition, and directed the petitioner to remove any office objections within four weeks.

Issues considered

  • Whether leave can be granted to amend the prayer clause of a civil application for condonation of delay
  • Whether the delay in filing the amendment can be condoned
  • Whether the writ petition can be restored upon amendment and condonation

Subjects

  • amendment of prayer clause
  • condonation of delay
  • civil application
  • writ petition
  • High Court of Bombay
  • procedural law

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:39572-DB


                                                   *1*                      9-ca-9430-2026


                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                               9 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9430 OF 2026
                                         IN WP/15259/2025

                                   Rahul Dattatraya Autade
                                           VERSUS
                   The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others
                                              ...
                Mr.Shubham Pawar h/f. Mr. Rahul R. Karpe, Advocate for
                Applicant
                Mr. M. K. Goyanaka, AGP for Respondents/State
                                              ...
                                  CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI &
                                            ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
                                  DATE : 29th AUGUST 2026
                P. C. :-

                1.        Learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to correct

                prayer      Clause   (A)   and   amend    the   prayer   clause      for

                incorporation of prayer for condonation of delay.

                2.        Leave is granted. Amendment to be carried out forthwith.

                3.        For the reasons stated in the Civil Application, delay is

                condoned and the application is allowed.

                4.        Writ Petition is restored. Petitioner is directed to remove

                office objections within a period of four (4) weeks from today.




                (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.)              (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)



                Narwade


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.