Bombay High Court
ANKUSH GANAPATRAO PANAK AND ANOTHERversusBHALCHANDRA NARAYANARAO WAGHMARE (DIED) AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- APPLICATION ALLOWED
Holding
The delay is not deliberate and is condoned; the abatement is set aside and permission is granted to bring the legal representatives of the deceased respondent on record.
Summary
The appellant filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 265‑day delay in filing a subsequent application to bring the legal representatives of a deceased respondent on record, and also requested that the abatement of the earlier proceeding be set aside. The respondents opposed the application. The court examined the reasons for the delay and found that it was not deliberately caused and that allowing the amendment would enable the matter to be decided on its merits. In the interest of justice, the court condoned the delay, set aside the abatement, and granted permission to bring the legal representatives of the deceased respondent on record, subject to a two‑week amendment period and a cost order. The order was pronounced by Justice Sanjay A. Deshmukh on 28‑08‑2026.
Issues considered
- Whether a delay of 265 days in filing an application to bring legal representatives of a deceased party on record can be condoned.
- Whether the abatement of the proceeding should be set aside.
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- abatement
- legal representatives
- civil procedure
- interest of justice
- amendment
Judgment
933 SA NO. 96 OF 2003.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
933 SECOND APPEAL NO. 96 OF 2003
Ankush Ganpatrao Penak And Ors.
VERSUS
Bhalchandra And Ors.
...
Mr. D N Suryawanshi, ., Advocate for Appellant
Ms. Pedgaonkar Anagha N., Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 to 4
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9671 OF 2026 IN SA/96/2003WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3277 OF 2026 IN SA/96/2003WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1385 OF 2003 IN SA/96/2003
CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : 28.08.2026
PER COURT :-
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9671 OF 2026 IN SA/96/2003
1. Heard learned Advocates for both sides.
2. This is an application for condonation of 265 days delay
caused in filing the Civil Application for bringing the legal
representatives of deceased Respondent No.1 on record as well as
for setting aside abatement and permission to bring the L.Rs. of
deceased Respondent No.1 on record.
3. Learned Advocate for the respondents strongly opposed
the application.
4. Perused the application. Considering the reasons
stated therein and the fact that the Applicants seek to bring the
1 of 2
(( 2 )) 933 SA NO. 96 OF 2003
legal representatives of the deceased Respondent No.1 on record so as
to enable this Court to decide the lis finally on merits, the delay
deserves to be condoned as it is not deliberately caused. Therefore,
the application deserves to be allowed in the interest of justice.
Hence, the following order:
::ORDER::
a. The application is allowed.
b. The delay of 265 days caused in filing the Civil
Application for bringing the legal representatives of
Respondent No.1 on record is condoned.
c. The abatement is set aside.
d. Permission to bring the legal representatives of
of deceased Respondent No.1 on record is granted.
The amendment be carried out within a period of two
weeks from today. If the amendment is not carried
out within the stipulated period, the applicants shall
be liable to pay costs of Rs.2,000/- to the Advocates’
Chambers Allottees Maintenance Co-operative
Society, High Court Premises, Chhatrapati
Sambhajinagar.
. List the matters on 11.09.2026.
[ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ]
HRJadhav
2 of 2
Checking your session…