Bombay High Court
Chief Executive Officer MIDC Mumbai 93 And AnrversusMurlidhar Chimaji Matsagar and Ors
- Disposal
- Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
Holding
The court held that the 274‑day delay is condoned.
Summary
The Chief Executive Officer of MIDC Mumbai and another filed an application seeking condonation of a 274‑day delay in filing a procedural request. The respondents were duly served with the application. The court examined the explanations provided by the applicants in paragraphs 4 to 6 of the petition. Finding the reasons satisfactory, the court condoned the delay and allowed the application. Consequently, the appeal was ordered to be placed for admission after removal of any office objections, and the application was disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether the 274‑day delay in filing the application for condonation should be condoned
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- civil procedure
- appeal admission
- High Court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:38144
1 950 CA 9788-2025.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
950 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9788 OF 2025
IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 24739 OF 2025
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER MIDC MUMBAI 93 AND ANOTHER
VERSUS
MURLIDHAR CHIMAJI MATSAGAR AND OTHERS
…
Mr. G.S. Khaire h/f. Mr. S.S. Dande – Advocate for Applicants
Mr. Harshwardhan Kadam h/f. Mr. Y.D. Kale – Advocate for Respondent
No.1
Mr. P.M. Kulkarni – AGP for Respondent No.2
…
CORAM : MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.
DATE : 21.08.2026
PER COURT :
1. This application is filed by the acquiring body for condonation of
delay of 274 days. All the respondents are served.
2. In view of the explanation given by the applicants in paragraphs 4
to 6 of the application, the delay of 274 days stands condoned and the
application is allowed.
3. The appeal be placed for admission after removal of office
objections, if any.
4. The application is accordingly disposed of.
[ MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J. ]
Pooja Kale/
Checking your session…