Bombay High Court

VAIBHAV BASWARAJ RAIKAWADEversusTHE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ORS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The application is allowed in terms of prayer clause B.

Summary

The petitioner, Vaibhav Baswaraj Raikawade, filed a civil application (No. 9963 of 2026) and writ petition (No. 6843 of 2026) in the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad bench, against the Union of India and other respondents. The matter was listed before a two‑judge bench comprising Justice Nitin B. Suryawanshi and Justice Abasaheb D. Shinde. Counsel for the petitioner were Mr. A. N. Barhate and Mr. S. S. Jadhav, while the respondents were represented by Senior Panel Counsel Mr. Rahul B. Bagul. After hearing the parties, the Court issued an order allowing the application in accordance with prayer clause “B”. No further factual or legal reasoning was recorded in the excerpt provided.

Subjects

writ petition
civil application
High Court
relief
prayer clause B

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:40574-DB


                                                                       ca9963-26.doc
                 drp
                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
                                    BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9963 OF 2026
                                                 IN
                                   WRIT PETITION NO.6843 OF 2026

                 Vaibhav Baswaraj Raikawade                           APPLICANT

                        VERSUS

                 The Union of India and Others                    RESPONDENTS

                                                 .......
                 Mr. A. N. Barhate h/f Mr. S. S. Jadhav, Advocate for Applicant
                 Mr. Rahul B. Bagul, Senior Panel Counsel for the Respondents
                                                 .......

                             [CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, &
                                      ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. J.]

                                      DATE : 4th SEPTEMBER, 2026

                 ORDER :

                 1.     Heard.


                 2.     For the reasons stated in the Application, the same is

                 allowed in terms of prayer clause “B”.



                 [ ABASAHEB D. SHINDE ]                   [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ]
                          JUDGE                                      JUDGE

                 drp/ca9963-26.doc

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…