Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SUNITA YUVRAJ JADHAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The amendment sought by the applicant is allowed.

Summary

Sunita Yuvraj Jadhav filed Civil Application No. 9977 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The applicant moved the court for amendment of the petition as per prayer clause ‘B’. The court examined the reasons set out in the application and found them sufficient to permit the amendment. Accordingly, the judges ordered that the amendment be effected within four weeks and that a copy of the amended petition be served on the respondents. The respondents were also given liberty to file a reply to the amended petition.

Issues considered

  • Whether the amendment sought by the applicant under prayer clause ‘B’ should be allowed.

Subjects

  • amendment of petition
  • civil procedure
  • high court order
  • procedural relief

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:40582-DB


                                                   {1}                     23-wp-9977-2026

                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
                                            BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                    23 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9977 OF 2026
                                               IN WP/8052/2026

                                        Sunita Yuvraj Jadhav
                                              VERSUS
                                The State Of Maharashtra And Others
                                                  ...
              Mr. N.L. Jadhav, Advocate for Applicant
              Mrs. Saie Joshi, AGP for State
                                                .......

                                          CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
                                                   ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.


                                             DATE : 04th SEPTEMBER, 2026
              PER COURT :

              1.       Heard.

              2.       For the reasons stated in the application, same is allowed in

              terms of prayer clause ‘B’.

              3.       Amendment be carried out within four weeks from today.

              4.       Amended copy be served on the other side.

              5.       Respondents are at liberty to file reply to the amended petition.



              (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.)                   (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)




              Bhagyawant Punde


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.