Bombay High Court
ASHLESHA AVINATH BHANDARKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The amendment sought in clause ‘B’ is permitted.
Summary
Ashlesa Avinath Bhandarkar filed a civil application before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking amendment of her petition against the State of Maharashtra and another respondent. The application specifically prayed for relief under clause ‘B’, which required the court’s permission to amend the pleadings. The court examined the reasons set out in the applicant’s petition and determined that they satisfied the requirements for amendment under the Civil Procedure Code. Consequently, the judges allowed the amendment as prayed for in clause ‘B’. The order directed that the amendment be effected within four weeks and that a copy of the amended petition be served on the respondents. The respondents were also given liberty to file a reply to the amended petition.
Issues considered
- Whether the amendment of the petition as prayed for in clause ‘B’ should be permitted by the court
Subjects
- Amendment
- Civil Procedure
- High Court
- Petition
- Jurisdiction
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:40583-DB
{1} 24-ca-9978-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
24 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9978 OF 2026
IN WP/9762/2024
Ashlesha Avinath Bhandarkar
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
...
Mr. N.L. Jadhav, Advocate for Applicant
Mr. V.M. Kagne, AGP for State
Mr. A.R. Joshi, Advocate for Respondent No. 2
.......
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE : 04th SEPTEMBER, 2026
PER COURT :
1. Heard.
2. For the reasons stated in the application, same is allowed in
terms of prayer clause ‘B’.
3. Amendment be carried out within four weeks from today.
4. Amended copy be served on the other side.
5. Respondents are at liberty to file reply to the amended petition.
(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)
Bhagyawant Punde
Checking your session…