Bombay High Court
ATUL PROPERTIESversusASHOKKUMAR SATPAL MEHRA
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dismissed
- Bench
- ARIF S DOCTOR
Holding
The application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The applicant failed to appear before the court on the scheduled date. Consequently, the court inferred that the applicant was not interested in pursuing the civil application. No arguments or evidence were presented. The court therefore dismissed the application for want of prosecution. No further orders were made.
Issues considered
- Whether the court can dismiss a civil application for want of prosecution when the applicant fails to appear
Subjects
- civil procedure
- want of prosecution
- dismissal
Judgment
1/1 6-CAA-939-2016 (C).DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION IN AO NO. 939 OF 2016
IN
APPEAL FROM ORDER(L) NO. 9193 OF 2016
Atul Properties ...Applicant
Versus
Ashokkumar Satpal Mehra ...Respondent
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION IN AO NO. 837 OF 2016
IN
APPEAL FROM ORDER(L) NO. 9173 OF 2016
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION IN AO NO. 838 OF 2016
IN
APPEAL FROM ORDER(L) NO. 9185 OF 2016
_______
None present for the Applicant.
_______
CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.
DATE : 17th JANUARY, 2026
P.C.
1. Today none is present on behalf of the Applicant.
2. Hence, it is clear that the Applicant is not desirous of prosecuting the
captioned Civil Application in Appeal from Order, the same is thus dismissed for
want of prosecution.
[ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.]
Areeb
Checking your session…