Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

UNION OF INDIA. THRO. THE GENERAL MANAGERversusMR. VINAYAK BALKRISHNA SAMANT AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

Both first appeals are disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary

The Union of India, through its General Manager, filed two civil applications and a first appeal challenging the existence of easementary rights over a parcel of land. The respondent, Mr. Vinayak Balkrishna Samant, contended that a building purportedly standing on the land did not, in fact, exist. The appellant argued that because the building was not present, there was no substantive right to be adjudicated, and consequently sought to withdraw the pending appeals. The Court noted that the first appeal (ST) No.16895 of 2019, previously not on board, was now taken on board along with the other appeal. Upon the appellant's request, the Court disposed of both first appeals as withdrawn and held any interim applications as infructuous. The order effectively terminates the litigation without a substantive decision on the easement claim.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate procedural step when the factual basis for an easement claim no longer exists?
  • Should the pending appeals be allowed to proceed or be withdrawn upon the appellant's request?

Subjects

  • easement
  • withdrawal of appeal
  • civil procedure
  • High Court of Bombay
  • interim application

Judgment

                                                                       22-CAF-3254-2019 (C).docx



                                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                             CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3254 OF 2019
                                                              WITH
                                             CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3255 OF 2019
                                                               IN
                                           FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 16899 OF 2019


         Digitally    Union of India through the General Manager                             ...Applicant /
         signed by
         BASAVRAJ
BASAVRAJ GURAPPA                                                                             Appellants
GURAPPA PATIL
PATIL    Date:
         2026.08.21   Versus
         10:40:16
         +0530
                      Mr. Vinayak Balkrishna Samant                                          ...Respondent
                                                              WITH
                                              FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.16895 OF 2019
                                                        (NOT ON BOARD)
                                                            _______
                      Mr. Rushikesh Bhorania a/w. Mr. Aman Bafar i/b. Chetan Agrawal for
                      the Appellants
                      Mr. Tejas S. Bhide Respondent Nos.1, 2a-2g and 3
                      Mr. Sant Kumar Patel, Asst. Divisional Engineer (Estate/North Borivali)
                      Mr. Mohit K. Bari, Senior Section eng. (Work) Borivali
                                                            _______
                                                   CORAM        :     ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.
                                                   DATE         :     19th AUGUST, 2026


                      P.C.


                      1.         First Appeal (St) No.16895 of 2019 is not on board. Upon mentioning,

                      taken on board along with this First Appeal.


                      2.         The learned counsel for the Appellant-Union of India makes a statement

                      that the building standing on the land in respect of which easementary rights

                      Basavraj                                                                 Page | 1
                                                     22-CAF-3254-2019 (C).docx



were asserted, does not stand. He, therefore, submits that nothing would survive

in these First Appeals and seeks to withdraw the same. Both the First Appeals

stand disposed of as withdrawn.


3.         Interim Applications, if any, stand disposed of as infructuous.




                                                      [ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.]




Basavraj                                                                     Page | 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.