Bombay High Court
SUNIL VASANT JADHAV and ANR.versusMANGAL SAMBHAJI BHOSALE and ORS.
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The application was dismissed as infructuous because the first appeal had already been disposed.
Summary
The applicants, Sunil Vasant Jadhav and another, filed a civil application (FA No. 835 of 2004) after the disposal of First Appeal No. 354 of 2004. They contended that, since the appeal had been decided, there was nothing left to be pursued in the application. The court accepted this submission and held that the application was no longer maintainable. Consequently, the court disposed of the application as infructuous. No further orders were made.
Issues considered
- Whether the civil application remains maintainable after the disposal of the first appeal on which it was based
Subjects
- civil application
- infructuous
- appeal disposal
- procedural law
Judgment
910.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION IN FA NO. 835 OF 2004
IN
FIRST APPEAL NO. 354 OF 2004
Sunil Vasant Jadhav And Anr. ...Applicants
Versus
Mangal Sambhaji Bhosale And Ors. ...Respondents
_______________________________________________________________
Mr. Sharad Bhosale, Advocate for the Applicants.
Ms. Suvarna Yadav, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1, 2 and 3.
Ms. S. S. Dwivedi, Advocate for the Respondent No. 4.
_______________________________________________________________
CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
DATE : 8th October, 2026.
P.C. :
1. Mr. Sharad Bhosale, learned Advocate for the Applicants, states
that in view of the disposal of the First Appeal No. 354 of 2004, nothing
further survives in this Application and as such this Application be
disposed of.
2. In view of the statement made by Mr. Sharad Bhosale, learned
Advocate for the Applicants, this Application is disposed of as
infructuous.
(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)
Digitally
signed by
ARJUN
ARJUN KRISHNA
KRISHNA RODGE
RODGE Date:
2026.10.09
22:02:08
+0530
Arjun 1
Checking your session…