Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

Jones Lang Lasalle Building Operations Pvt LtdversusRikki Ronie Developers through its partner Deven P Shah

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The court recorded the consent terms and disposed of the application in accordance with the settlement.

Summary

The petitioners, Sayali Deepak Upasani Pvt. Ltd., and the respondents, Rikki Ronie Developers, filed a commercial arbitration application. The parties subsequently reached an amicable settlement and submitted consent terms signed by both parties and their counsel. The court recorded the consent terms, marking them for identification, and accepted any undertakings contained therein as binding on the court. Relying on the settlement, the court ordered the application to be disposed of in accordance with the consent terms. No further adjudication on the merits was required.

Issues considered

  • Whether the court may record consent terms and dispose of the arbitration application based on the parties' settlement

Subjects

  • consent decree
  • settlement
  • commercial arbitration
  • court disposal

Judgment

                                                                       3-CARAP-105-2026.doc



                                                                                 Sayali


                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                               ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
                                   IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION
SAYALI
DEEPAK              COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO.105 OF 2026
UPASANI
                   Jones Lang Lasalle Building Operations
Digitally signed
by SAYALI          Pvt. Ltd.                                     … Petitioner
DEEPAK
UPASANI                       V/s.
Date: 2026.09.02
18:25:07 +0530     Rikki Ronie Developers through its
                   Partner Deven P Shah                          … Respondent

                   Mr. Ibrahim Shaikh, for Petitioner.
                   Ms. Nikita Jain, for Respondent.


                                                CORAM      : AMIT BORKAR, J.

                                                DATED      : SEPTEMBER 2, 2026

                   P.C.:

                   1.      The parties have amicably resolved their dispute by
                   arrived at settlement. The parties have tendered consent terms
                   signed by them and their Advocates.

                   2.      The consent terms are taken on record and marked ‘X’ for
                   identification. The undertakings, if any, in the consent terms are
                   accepted as undertakings to the Court.

                   3.      In view of the consent terms, the application is disposed of
                   accordingly.

                                                               (AMIT BORKAR, J.)


                                                     1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.