Bombay High Court
MAHESHCHANDRA NARMADASHANKAR PANDYA AND 3 ORSversusPRAGNA RAJANIKANT PANDYA
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
Holding
The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
The applicants, Maheshchandra Narmadashankar Pandya and others, filed a commercial arbitration application before the Bombay High Court. The court had earlier issued an order on 11 September 2026 directing the petitioners to comply with certain requirements. The petitioners failed to appear before the court and did not comply with the order. The respondent, Pragna Rajanikant Pandya, was represented by Ms. Vrushali Parab on behalf of Mr. Mehul Shah and by Mr. K.L. Vyas for a proposed respondent. The court, noting the petitioners' non‑prosecution, dismissed the petition. The dismissal was entered without any further hearing.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate consequence when petitioners fail to comply with a court order and do not appear for further proceedings?
Subjects
- commercial arbitration
- non‑prosecution
- petition dismissal
- court order compliance
- Bombay High Court
Judgment
13-CARAP-89-2020(1).doc
Vivekanand
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
VIVEKANAND
Digitally signed
by VIVEKANAND
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
RAJENDRA
RAJENDRA
BONDE
BONDE
Date: 2026.09.24
17:15:34 +0530
IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION
COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO.89 OF 2020
Maheshchandra Narmadashankar
Pandya And 3 Ors … Applicants
V/s.
Pragna Rajanikant Pandya … Respondent
None for the Applicants.
Ms. Vrushali Parab i/b Mr. Mehul Shah, for
Respondent.
Mr. K.L. Vyas, for proposed Respondent.
CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J.
DATED : SEPTEMBER 24, 2026
P.C.:
1. Since the Petitioners have not complied with the order
dated 11 September 2026, today none appears for the
Petitioners.
2. The Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
1
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.