Bombay High Court
HINDURAO DNYANU CHOUGULE (DECEASED THROUGH HEIRS)versusBABURAO BAPU CHOUGULE AND ORS.
- Disposal
- Allowed
Holding
The court held that the civil application is allowed, permitting the addition of the legal heirs as respondents, subject to amendment within two weeks.
Summary
The appellant filed a civil application to bring on record the legal heirs of a deceased appellant as respondents, alleging that those heirs (respondents 9 to 11) are unwilling to sign vakalatnama or appear. The appellant argued that, in the absence of their participation, they must be added as respondents. The bailiff report showed that respondent 10 could not be located at the address in the cause title, while respondents 9 and 11 had been served. No opposition was raised by the heirs, and the court heard counsel for both sides before reviewing the application. The court found a case made out for allowing the application and ordered that the amendment be effected within two weeks.
Issues considered
- Whether the legal heirs of a deceased appellant can be added as respondents through a civil application when they refuse to appear.
- Whether the court may permit amendment of the parties to include such heirs despite their non‑appearance.
Subjects
- civil procedure
- addition of parties
- legal heirs
- civil application
- amendment of pleadings
Judgment
2-CAS-1293-2017 (C).docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1293 OF 2017
IN
SECOND APPEAL NO. 774 OF 2015
Hindurao Dnyanu Chougule
(deceased Through Heirs) ...Applicant
VERSUS
Baburao Bapu Chougule And Ors ...Respondents
___________
Ms.Preeti Walimbe (Through VC) a/w. Mr. Moin Momin, Advocate
for Appellant.
Mr. Onkar Bajaj i/b. Mr Kuldeep Nikam, Advocate for respondent
nos. 1, 2A to 2D, 3A to 3C & 3 to 6.
___________
CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.
DATE : 28 AUGUST 2026
P. C. :
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1293 OF 2017
1. This civil application has been filed by the appellant to bring
on record the legal heirs of deceased appellant No. 1(d).
2. It is the case of the appellant that the legal heirs of deceased
appellant No. 1(d) are respondent Nos. 9 to 11. They are not ready
to either come forward and sign vakalatnama and appear along with
the present appellant.
3. Hence, the appellant has no other choice but to add the legal
heirs of deceased appellant No. 1(d) as respondents.
4. Office remark shows that respondent Nos. 9 and 11 have been
Rushi 1 of 2
2-CAS-1293-2017 (C).docx
served.
5. As regards respondent No. 10, the bailiff report shows that
respondent No. 10 is not residing at the address as mentioned in the
cause title.
6. None appears on behalf of respondent Nos. 9 to 11 when the
matter is called out.
7. I have heard the counsel appearing for the appellant and the
counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 1 to 6 and I have gone
through the contents of the civil application. A case is made out to
allow the civil application. Civil application stands allowed in terms
of prayer clauses (a) and (b).
8. Amendment to be carried out within a period of two weeks
from today.
[RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]
Rushi 2 of 2
Checking your session…