Bombay High Court
JANARDHAN SHANKAR DHONE AND ORS.versusSADASHIV SHANKAR DHONE AND ORS.
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The court held that both civil applications were timely and allowed them, and it also granted condonation of the 86‑day delay in filing the second appeal.
Summary
The appellant filed Civil Application No. 14 of 2018 to record the legal heirs of a deceased appellant, and the court found the application to be within the prescribed time and allowed it. Similarly, Civil Application No. 13 of 2017 was filed to record the legal heirs of a deceased respondent, and the court also allowed it as it was timely. Civil Application No. 630 of 2018 sought condonation of an 86‑day delay in filing a second appeal; the court granted the condonation, ordered fresh notice to newly added respondents, and permitted service by all permissible modes. The court directed that amendments be made within two weeks for the first two applications. The judgment was delivered by Justice Rajesh S. Patil on 28 August 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether the civil applications to record legal heirs were filed within the time limit.
- Whether the 86‑day delay in filing the second appeal can be condoned.
Subjects
- legal heirs
- civil application
- condonation of delay
- second appeal
- amendment
- service of notice
Judgment
4-CAS-14-2018 (C).docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14 OF 2018
IN
SECOND APPEALST NO. 20912 OF 2016
Janardhan Shankar Dhone And Ors ...Applicants
VERSUS
Sadashiv Shankar Dhone And Ors ...Respondents
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13 OF 2018
IN
SECOND APPEALST NO. 20912 OF 2016
Janardhan Shankar Dhone And Ors ...Applicants
VERSUS
Sadashiv Shankar Dhone And Ors ...Respondents
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 630 OF 2017
IN
SECOND APPEALST NO. 20912 OF 2016
Janardhan Shankar Dhone And Ors ...Applicants
VERSUS
Sadashiv Shankar Dhone And Ors ...Respondents
___________
Mr. Shiraji Kokare i/b. Mr. Vishwanath Talkute, Advocate for the
Applicants.
___________
CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.
DATE : 28 AUGUST 2026
P. C. :
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14 OF 2018
1. This civil application has been filed by the appellant to bring
on record the legal heirs of deceased appellant No. 1. Application is
Rushi 1 of 3
4-CAS-14-2018 (C).docx
within time.
2. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and have gone
through the contents of the civil application. A case is made out to
allow the civil application.
3. Civil application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
4. Amendment to be carried out within a period of two weeks
from today.
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13 OF 2017
5. This civil application is filed to bring on record the legal heirs
of deceased respondent No. 1. Application is within time.
6. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and have gone
through the contents of the civil application. A case is made out to
allow the civil application.
7. Civil application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
8. Amendment to be carried out within a period of two weeks
from today.
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 630 OF 2018
9. This civil application is filed for condonation of delay in filing
the second appeal. Delay is of 86 days.
10. Issue fresh notice to newly added respondents, returnable on
24 September 2026.
11. Apart from court notice, the Applicant is permitted to serve
Rushi 2 of 3
4-CAS-14-2018 (C).docx
the respondents by advocate’s private service, by all permissible
modes of service and file affidavit of service before the next date of
the hearing.
[RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]
Rushi 3 of 3
Checking your session…