Bombay High Court
SHRI. NIVRUTI SHANKAR KHULE AND ANOTHERversusSHRI. MANOHAR SHANKAR KHULE AND OTHERS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The appeal was disposed of and the decree modified in accordance with the parties' mediated consent terms.
Summary
The appellants filed a second appeal (No. 582 of 2014) which was referred to mediation on 16 June 2026. The mediator’s report dated 29 August 2026 confirmed successful mediation and the parties executed consent terms on the same day. The consent terms were signed by all appellants and respondents and were placed on record. The court, noting the parties’ settlement, disposed of the second appeal and modified the impugned decree in accordance with the consent terms. Consequently, the related civil application was also deemed disposed as it no longer survived the settlement.
Subjects
- mediation
- civil appeal
- consent decree
- settlement
- disposal
- court modification
Judgment
Sonali Mane 17-SA-582-2014.docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SECOND APPEAL NO. 582 OF 2014
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1410 OF 2014
IN
SECOND APPEAL NO. 582 OF 2014
Shri. Nivruti Shankar Khule (Decd.) Thr. Lrs.
Anil Nivruti Khule And Ors. … Appellants
Versus
Shri. Manohar Shankar Khule And Ors. … Respondents
None for Appellants.
Mr. Sachin Gite for Respondents.
CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
DATE : 9 SEPTEMBER 2026.
P.C. :
1) By Order dated 16 June, 2026, the appeal was sent for mediation.
The mediator has submitted his report dated 29 August, 2026, the
report indicates successful completion of mediation proceedings.
Parties have arrived at consent terms dated 29 August, 2026. The
consent terms are signed by Appellant Nos. 1a to 1c and 2 and by
Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3. The consent terms are forwarded to the
MANE
SONALI
DILIP
Digitally signed by
MANE SONALI DILIP ___Page No.1 of 2___
Date: 2026.09.11
11:29:38 +0530
9 September 2026
Sonali Mane 17-SA-582-2014.docx
Court alongwith report of the mediator through the District Mediation
Center, Nashik.
2) The consent terms are taken on record and marked as “X” for
identification. The report of the mediator dated 29 August, 2026 is also
taken on record and marked “X-1” for identification. Since the consent
terms are signed and executed by the parties before the mediator, it
would be appropriate to dispose of the Second Appeal in view of the
terms settled between the parties.
3) The Second Appeal is accordingly disposed of in view of the
consent terms. The impugned decree shall accordingly stand modified,
in accordance with the consent terms.
4) In view of disposal of the Second Appeal, the Civil Application
does not survive and hence stands disposed of.
[SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.]
___Page No.2 of 2___
9 September 2026
Checking your session…