Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHRI. AJIT BASGONDA DHERE and ANRversusULHAS MADHAVRAO PATWARDHAN and ORS.

Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Second Appeal is dismissed as abated.

Summary

The appellants did not appear before the court. Notice was duly served to Appellant No.1, while notice to Appellant No.2 was returned marked “Dead”. The appeal had already been abated against Respondent No.1, and no steps were taken to bring the legal heirs of the deceased respondent on record or to set aside the abatement. Consequently, the Second Appeal was dismissed as abated. All pending interim applications were consequently disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Second Appeal can proceed when a respondent is deceased and his legal heirs have not been joined.
  • Whether the abatement of the appeal can be set aside.

Subjects

  • abatement
  • second appeal
  • service of notice
  • legal heirs
  • dismissal

Judgment

                                                                          13-1712-19-cas.doc


                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                    CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                                   CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                    SECOND APPEAL ST NO. 25972 OF 2017
                                                    WITH
                                     CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1712 OF 2019
                                                     IN
                                    SECOND APPEAL ST NO. 25972 OF 2017
                                                    WITH
                                     CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1713 OF 2019
                                                     IN
                                    SECOND APPEAL ST NO. 25972 OF 2017

                     Shri. Ajit Basgonda Dhere & Anr                     ....Appellants
                           Vs.
                     Ulhas Madhavrao Patwardhan & Ors.                 ....Respondents


                     None for the Applicants/Appellants
                     Mr. Tejpal S. Ingale a/w Ms. Vrunali Vilankar, advocate for
                     Respondent No. 1

                                               CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.
                                               DATE : 20 AUGUST 2026

                     P. C. :

                     1.        None appears for the Appellants when the matter is called

                     out. Today, this matter was taken up on board as there was a
IRESH
MASHAL
                     praecipe filed by the Advocate for the Respondents. Office remark
Digitally signed
by IRESH
MASHAL
Date:
2026.08.20
                     shows that notice issued to Appellant No.1 is duly served and as
19:29:28
+0530



                     far notice issued to Appellant No.2, it is returned back with

                     remark “Dead” on 16 May 2025.

                     2.        Appeal has already been abated against Respondent No. 1.

                                                       1 of 2
             Iresh
                                                      13-1712-19-cas.doc


No steps have been taken to bring on record the legal heirs of the

deceased Respondent No. 1 and for setting aside the abatement.

3.   Hence, Second Appeal stands dismissed as abated.

4.   In view of dismissal of Second Appeal, all pending Interim

Applications stand disposed of accordingly.



                                              [RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]




                               2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.