Bombay High Court
DIGAMBER ANNASO MANE-DESHMUKHversusSMT. TARAMATI BHAGWAN BHAGAT
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The second appeal is dismissed in default due to the appellant’s non‑appearance.
Summary
The appellant, Digamber Annaso Mane‑Deshmukh, failed to appear before the Bombay High Court when his second appeal (No. 313 of 2017) was called. The Court noted the non‑appearance and dismissed the appeal in default. Consequently, all pending civil and interim applications related to the appeal were also disposed of. No substantive factual or legal issues were addressed as the matter was decided solely on procedural default. The judgment was delivered by Justice Rajesh S. Patil on 4 September 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether a civil appeal can be dismissed for the appellant’s failure to appear
Subjects
- default judgment
- civil appeal
- non‑appearance
- procedural dismissal
Judgment
3-SA-313-2017.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
SECOND APPEAL NO. 313 OF 2017
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION IN SA NO. 298 OF 2017
IN
SECOND APPEAL NO. 313 OF 2017
Digamber Annaso Mane-Deshmukh …Appellant
Vs
Smt. Taramati Bhagwan Bhagat …Respondent
None for the Appellant
CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.
DATE : 4 SEPTEMBER 2026
P. C. :
1. None appears for the Appellant when the matter is called out.
2. Second Appeal stands dismissed in default.
IRESH
MASHAL
3. In sequel, all pending Civil/Interim Applications stand
Digitally
signed by
IRESH
disposed of accordingly.
MASHAL
Date:
2026.09.04
19:22:59
+0530
(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)
1/1
Iresh
Checking your session…