Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

NANA DAMU DAHIBHATEversusGANPAT DAGDU KHAIRE AND OTHERS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The appeal is abated and the civil application dismissed because the appellant died and no legal representative was appointed.

Summary

The appellant, Nana Damu Dahibhate, filed a second appeal and a related civil application. During proceedings, the appellant died and no legal representative could be identified despite efforts. The court was asked to determine whether the appeal could continue in the absence of a representative. It held that the appeal could not proceed and was therefore abated. Consequently, the civil application, which was dependent on the appeal, was also dismissed.

Issues considered

  • Can a civil appeal continue when the appellant has died and no legal representative is appointed?
  • Does a civil application survive the dismissal of the parent appeal?

Subjects

  • abatement
  • death of party
  • civil appeal
  • legal representation
  • procedural law

Judgment

                       Priyanka                                           29-SA(ST)-35689-2017.docx


                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                           CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                       SECOND APPEAL(ST) NO.35689 OF 2017
                                                         WITH
                                         CIVIL APPLICATION NO.848 OF 2018


                       Nana Damu Dahibhate                                   ...Appellant
                                         V/s.

                       Ganpat Dagdu Khaire & Ors                           ...Respondents
                                                    ________________
          Digitally
          signed by

                       Ms. Devashri G. Karandikar i/by Mr. Saurabh M. Railkar for the Appellant.
          PRIYANKA
PRIYANKA  MADHAVRAO
MADHAVRAO KALE
KALE      Date:
          2026.08.29

                       Mr. Manish Kelkar a/w Ms. Gauri Phadake for Respondent Nos.10 to 12.
          18:17:53
          +0530




                                                    ________________
                                                               CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
                                                               DATED: 28 AUGUST 2026.
                       P.C.:
                       1)          The learned counsel appearing for the Appellant submits
                       that, the sole Appellant has passed away and despite making best efforts,
                       no instructions are received for bringing on record legal representative of
                       the deceased Appellant.


                       2)          The Appeal is according disposed of as abated.


                       3)          In view of the dismissal of the Appeal, Civil Application,
                       does not survive and is accordingly disposed off.


                                                                         [SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.]

                                                        Page No.1 of 1
                                                       28 August 2026


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.