Bombay High Court
SMT. PARVATIBAI MAHADEO MAHADIKversusSHRI. SAHADEO NAMDEO MAHADIK (SINCE DECD) THROUGH LRS. AND ANR.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The application is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
The applicant, Sayali Parvatibai Mahadeo Mahadik, filed a civil application (No. 1984 of 2017) seeking relief against the respondents. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant, and the respondents were represented by Ms. Neha Patil (on behalf of Akshay Vijay Kamble) and Mr. Suyash Sule (for Drupad Patil). The court noted the absence of representation for the applicant and consequently dismissed the application for non‑prosecution. No substantive merits of the case were examined. The order was pronounced by Justice Amit Borkar on 31 August 2026.
Issues considered
- The court considered whether the application should be dismissed for non‑prosecution due to the applicant’s failure to appear.
Subjects
- non‑prosecution
- application dismissal
- civil procedure
- court order
Judgment
35-CAW-1984-17+.doc
Sayali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1984 OF 2017
SAYALI IN
DEEPAK WRIT PETITION NO. 4361 OF 2025
UPASANI
Digitally signed
by SAYALI Parvatibai Mahadeo Mahadik … Applicant
DEEPAK
UPASANI V/s.
Date: 2026.08.31
14:52:31 +0530 Sahadeo Namdeo Mahadik Since Deced.
Thr. Lrs and Others … Respondents
None for Applicant.
Ms. Neha Patil, i/b Akshay Vijay Kamble, for
Respondent nos. 1A to G and I.
Mr. Suyash Sule, for Drupad Patil, for Respondent no.
1 (h).
CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J.
DATED : AUGUST 31, 2026
P.C.:
1. None appears on behalf of the applicant.
2. Accordingly, the application is dismissed for non-
prosecution.
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
1
Checking your session…