Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

Ramsons PrintersversusWhite Tiger Trading Private Limited

Decided
Disposal
CONSENT TERM

Holding

The suit is decreed in terms of the Consent Terms.

Summary

Ramsons Printers and its partners filed a commercial IP suit against White Tiger Trading Private Limited. During the hearing, both parties informed the court that they had settled the dispute and presented a signed Consent Terms document, which was executed by the authorized representatives of each side and their counsel. The court accepted the Consent Terms as valid undertakings and ordered that the suit be decreed in accordance with those terms. It also ordered a refund of court fees as per the applicable rules. Consequently, the suit was disposed of per the settlement and any related interim applications were also dismissed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the court can pass a decree based on a settlement agreement (Consent Terms) signed by the parties and their authorized representatives.

Subjects

  • settlement
  • consent decree
  • commercial IP suit
  • court fees
  • interim application disposal
  • decree

Judgment

                                                   5 IAL-4698-2025.DOC
skt



         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
             ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
                  IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION
                COMMERCIAL IP SUIT NO. 416 OF 2025

1. Ramsons Printers
2. Ashok K. Chhabria                                 …Plaintiffs
3. Mahesh K. Chhabria
          Vs.
White Tiger Trading Private Limited          …Defendant
                              WITH
         INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 4698 OF 2025
                              WITH
         INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 9211 OF 2025
                                IN
             COMMERCIAL IP SUIT NO. 416 OF 2025
Ramsons Printers & Ors.                              …Applicants
In the matter between :
Ramsons Printers & Ors.                              …Plaintiffs
          Vs.
White Tiger Trading Private Limited                  …Defendant


Ms. Preeta Panthaki i/b. Krishna and Saurastri Associates LLP, for
the Plaintiffs/Applicants.
Ms. Saloni Kharidia a/w. Ms. Ginni Medh, a/w. Shaista Pathan and
Saloni Kharidia, i/b. YNA Legal LLP, for the Defendants.
Mr. Ashok K. Chhabria, Partner of the Plaintiff is present.
Mr. Rahul Chhabria, Director of the Defendant and Mrs. Aarti
Chhabria Director and Authorised Signatory of the Defendant are
present through VC.
Mrs. S.S.Chipkar, Master (Adm.), Court Receiver.


                      CORAM:      MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
                      DATE :      20th AUGUST, 2026
P. C.:


                                 Page 1 of 11
                               20th August, 2026
                                                     5 IAL-4698-2025.DOC
skt



1.    Learned counsel appearing for the Plaintiffs and learned

counsel appearing for the Defendant state that the parties have

settled the dispute and tenders the Consent Terms. The Consent

Terms are signed by the Plaintiff No. 2- Ashok K. Chhabria, who is

the partner of Plaintiff No.1 and also constituted attorney of

Plaintiff No. 3-Mr. Mahesh K. Chhabria. The Plaintiff Nos.2 and 3

are partners of Plaintiff No. 1. The Consent Terms are also signed

by Mr. Rahul Chhabria, Director of the Defendant and Mrs. Aarti

Rahul Chhabria, the Director and authorised signatory of the

Defendant.   The Board Resolution dated 10th January, 2026 is

annexed to the Consent Terms which authorises Mrs. Aarti Rahul

Chhabria to inter alia sign the Consent Terms. Mr. Rahul Chhabria

and Mrs. Aarti Rahul Chhabria are present through video

conference and state that they have settled the disputes in terms of

the Consent Terms. The Consent Terms are also signed by the

respective advocates and they identify signatures of respective

parties. Accordingly, the Consent Terms are taken on record and

marked “X” for identification.



2.    A scanned copy of the Consent Terms is reproduced

hereinbelow :



                                   Page 2 of 11
                                 20th August, 2026
                          5 IAL-4698-2025.DOC
skt




        Page 3 of 11
      20th August, 2026
                          5 IAL-4698-2025.DOC
skt




        Page 4 of 11
      20th August, 2026
                          5 IAL-4698-2025.DOC
skt




        Page 5 of 11
      20th August, 2026
                          5 IAL-4698-2025.DOC
skt




        Page 6 of 11
      20th August, 2026
                          5 IAL-4698-2025.DOC
skt




        Page 7 of 11
      20th August, 2026
                          5 IAL-4698-2025.DOC
skt




        Page 8 of 11
      20th August, 2026
                          5 IAL-4698-2025.DOC
skt




        Page 9 of 11
      20th August, 2026
                          5 IAL-4698-2025.DOC
skt




        Page 10 of 11
      20th August, 2026
                                                    5 IAL-4698-2025.DOC
skt




3.    Various statements made by the parties contained in the

Consent Terms are accepted as undertakings given to this Court.


4.    The Suit is decreed in terms of the Consent Terms.

5.    Refund of Court fees as per Rules.

6.    In view of the disposal of the Suit, the connected Interim

Applications, if any, also stand disposed of.



                                             [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]




                                  Page 11 of 11
                                20th August, 2026


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.