Bombay High Court

SHREYAS INFRASTRUCTUREversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ORS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The contempt petition is disposed of for non‑prosecution.

Summary

Shreyas Infrastructure filed a contempt petition (No. 117 of 2010) against the State of Maharashtra and others in 2010. The petition was not circulated after 2013 and the petitioner failed to appear before the court. The respondents appeared through counsel. The bench noted the lack of any appearance or prosecution by the petitioner. Consequently, the court disposed of the contempt petition on the ground of non‑prosecution.

Issues considered

Whether the contempt petition should proceed despite the petitioner’s non‑appearance and lack of circulation after 2013

Subjects

contempt
non-prosecution
petition disposal
court procedure

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:43492

                                                               903 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 117 OF 2010




                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                            903 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 117 OF 2010
                                      IN WP/1215/2010

                                           Shreyas Infrastructure
                                                   Versus
                                    The State Of Maharashtra And Others

                     __________________________________________________________
                       • Adv. Kale Ajeet B. for the Petitioner - Absent
                       • Mr. A. S. Shinde, Addl.G.P. for State
                       • Adv. S. S. Wagh h/f. Adv. Shelke Shivaji T. for
                          Respondent No. 4
                     __________________________________________________________


                                       CORAM      : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
                                                    VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

                                       DATE       : SEPTEMBER 23, 2026


                     ORDER : [PER VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.]

                     1)             None for the petitioner.

                     2)             The contempt petition is not circulated after the

                     year 2013. Today also, none appears for the petitioner.

                     3)             Contempt Petition is, therefore, disposed of for

                     non-prosecution.



                     (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV)             (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
                               JUDGE                             JUDGE




                     Komal Kamble                                                     Page| 1 of 1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…