Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHRUTIKA SATISH HERWADE ALIAS VAISHALI PARASHRAM NAKATEversusSUHAS BAPUSO PATIL SECRETARY LATTE EDUCATION SOCIETY AND ORS.

Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court allowed the withdrawal of the contempt petition with liberty to file appropriate proceedings.

Summary

The petitioner, Shrutika Satish Herwade, filed Contempt Petition No. 119 of 2026 arising out of Writ Petition No. 6206 of 2016 against the respondents. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Rahul B. Khot, sought to withdraw the contempt petition and requested liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings later. The respondents opposed the withdrawal. The Bench comprising Justice Rajesh S. Patil and Justice Abhay J. Mantri considered the petitioner's request. The Court granted leave to withdraw the contempt petition, allowing the petitioner freedom to file suitable proceedings in the future. Consequently, the contempt petition was disposed of as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a contempt petition may be withdrawn by the petitioner at the stage of proceedings?

Subjects

  • contempt
  • withdrawal
  • civil procedure
  • high court
  • petition

Judgment

                                                                                                903-CP-119-2026 (C).doc



                                             IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY
                                                      CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                                                     CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                  CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 119 OF 2026
                                                                 IN
                                                    WRIT PETITION NO. 6206 OF 2016

                              Shrutika Satish Herwade
                              Alias Vaishali Parashram Nakate                    ..… Petitioner
                                     VERSUS
                              Suhas Bapuso Patil And Ors.                        ..… Respondents
                                                                    ...
                              Mr. Rahul B Khot, Advocate for Petitioner.
                              Mr. Santosh Shah a/w Mr. Paras Shah, Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 1 to
                              4.
                              Mr. Atul P. Vanarase, AGP for Respondent-State.
                                                                    ...
                                                                CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL AND
                                                                           ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.
                                                                DATE     : 2 SEPTEMBER 2026.
                              P. C. :

                              1.            Mr. Khot, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner, on

                              instructions, submits that the Petitioner is not pressing the Contempt Petition

                              any further. He seeks leave to withdraw the present Petition with liberty to

                              file appropriate proceedings. Leave, as prayed for, is granted.

                              2.          Hence, the Contempt Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn, with

                              liberty as prayed for.




           Digitally signed
                                        (ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.)              (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.)
           by TALLE
TALLE      SHUBHAM
           ASHOKRAO
SHUBHAM    Date:
ASHOKRAO   2026.09.03
           14:38:51
           +0530


                              Shubham                              1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.