Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHAIKH SHAFIULLA BADSHAHAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The contempt petition is disposed as the order under contempt has been complied with.

Summary

Shaikh Shafiulla Badshaha filed a contempt petition (No. 121 of 2010) against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner, through Adv. Vikrant Valse and Adv. T. M. Venjane, submitted that the order under contempt had been complied with. The court, after considering the submission, found that the compliance was satisfactory. Consequently, the court disposed of the contempt petition. No further directions were issued.

Issues considered

  • Whether the order under contempt has been complied with by the respondents

Subjects

  • contempt of court
  • compliance
  • petition disposal
  • high court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:43493

                                                           904 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 121 OF 2010




                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                            904 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 121 OF 2010
                                      IN WP/1267/2008

                                         Shaikh Shafiulla Badshaha
                                                   Versus
                                    The State Of Maharashtra And Others

                     __________________________________________________________
                       • Adv. Vikrant Valse h/f. Adv. T. M. Venjane for the
                          Petitioner
                       • Mr. S. J. Salgare, A.G.P. for State
                       • Adv. Hanumant V. Patil for Respondent No. 2
                     __________________________________________________________


                                       CORAM     : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
                                                   VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

                                       DATE      : SEPTEMBER 23, 2026


                     ORDER : [PER VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.]

                     1)             Learned   advocate    Mr.    Valse       holding        for

                     Mr. Venjane, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                     the order under contempt is complied with.

                     2)             In view of the same, the contempt petition

                     stands disposed of.



                     (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV)             (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
                               JUDGE                             JUDGE




                     Komal Kamble                                                 Page| 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.