Bombay High Court

RAHUL OMPRAKASH TODAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The contempt petition is disposed of as withdrawn upon the petitioner's request.

Summary

Petitioner Rahul Omprakash Toda filed a contempt petition (Contempt Petition No. 128 of 2013) against the State of Maharashtra and another respondent. The petitioner, through counsel Navandar Mehul Vikas, later instructed the court to withdraw the petition. The respondents were represented by G. A. Kulkarni, Advocate General for the State, while the second respondent's counsel was absent. The bench consisting of Judges Sandipkumar C. More and Vaishali Patil-Jadhav considered the request for withdrawal. The court accepted the withdrawal and disposed of the contempt petition as withdrawn.

Issues considered

Whether a contempt petition filed by a petitioner can be withdrawn at the petitioner's request

Subjects

contempt
withdrawal
petition
civil procedure
high court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:39017

                                                                 905 CONT. PETITION NO. 128 OF 2013




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                   905 CONT. PETITION NO. 128 OF 2013
                                            IN WP/8205/2012

                                               Rahul Omprakash Toda
                                                       Versus
                                        The State Of Maharashtra And Another

                     __________________________________________________________
                     Adv. Navandar Mehul Vikas for the Petitioner
                     Mr. G. A. Kulkarni, AGP for State
                     Adv. V. D. Gunale for Respondent No. 2 - Absent
                     __________________________________________________________


                                            CORAM    : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
                                                       VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

                                            DATE     : AUGUST 28, 2026

                     PER COURT :

                     .         Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions,

                     seeks withdrawal of the present petition. Accordingly,

                     Contempt Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.



                     (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV)               (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
                               JUDGE                               JUDGE




                         Komal Kamble                                                Page 1 of 1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…