Bombay High Court
LAXMIBAI BAPURAO KADAMversusSHRIKANT DESHPANDE AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The petition was dismissed as no contempt existed because the order had been complied with.
Summary
The petitioner, Laxmibai Bapurao Kadam, filed a contempt petition alleging non‑compliance with a prior court order. The respondent, Shrikant Deshpande and others, were alleged to have disobeyed the order. The learned Additional Government Pleader submitted that the order had been complied with by deciding the petitioner’s representation. The Court examined the submission and found that the order was indeed complied with. Consequently, the Court held that no contempt existed and dismissed the petition, ordering it to be disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether the alleged non‑compliance with the earlier order amounts to contempt of court
Subjects
- contempt
- order compliance
- petition disposed
- high court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:41110
908 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 13 OF 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
908 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 13 OF 2014
IN WP/5082/2011
Laxmibai Bapurao Kadam
Versus
Shrikant Deshpande And Others
__________________________________________________________
Adv. R. K. Kharat h/f. Adv. V. S. Panpatte for the Petitioner
Mr. A. S. Shinde, Addl.G.P. for State
__________________________________________________________
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 02, 2026
ORDER : [PER VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.]
1) Learned Addl.G.P. submits that the order of
which disobedience is alleged by way of this petition is
complied with by deciding the representation of the
petitioner.
2) In view of the compliance of the order, nothing
survives in present Contempt Petition and the same stands
disposed of.
(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
JUDGE JUDGE
Komal Kamble Page| 1 of 1
Checking your session…