Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

KUNAL VIKRAM SAWANTversusKRUSHNABAI ALIAS KISABAI GANPAT ALANDKAR KOLI

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The contempt petition was disposed of because the parties had settled the controversy and the appeal was already disposed.

Summary

The petitioners filed a contempt petition (No.139 of 2025) arising from an appeal (Order No.132 of 2020). The parties subsequently reached a full settlement of the underlying dispute through consent terms, and the appeal itself was disposed of. Counsel for the petitioners informed the Court that, given the settlement, they did not wish to pursue the contempt proceedings. The Court considered that there was no longer any controversy to sustain a contempt claim. Accordingly, the Court ordered the contempt petition to be disposed of. No further directions were issued.

Issues considered

  • Whether the contempt petition should proceed when the parties have settled the underlying dispute and the appeal has been disposed of

Subjects

  • contempt
  • settlement
  • appeal
  • civil procedure

Judgment

                                                                               82-CP-139-2025.odt

                       Priyanka

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                         CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                      CONTEMPT PETITION NO.139 OF 2025
                                                     IN
                                     INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1574 OF 2020
                                                     IN
                                      APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.132 OF 2020
                       Kunal Vikram Sawant & Ors                                 ... Petitioners
                                    V/s.
                       Krushnabai @ Kisabai Ganpat Alandkar & Ors                ... Respondents
          Digitally
          signed by
          PRIYANKA
          MADHAVRAO
                       _____________________________________________________________
PRIYANKA
MADHAVRAO KALE
KALE      Date:
          2026.09.05
          12:38:21
          +0530
                       Mr. Jaydeep Deo for the Petitioners.
                       Prajit S. Sahane for Respondent Nos.3 to 5.
                       ________________________________________________________
                                    CORAM : PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.
                                    DATE : 1ST SEPTEMBER, 2026.
                       P.C. :-

                       1.          Not on board. Mentioned. Taken on board.

                       2.          Learned counsel for the petitioner states that, since the

                       parties have already compromised the entire controversy in view of

                       consent terms and the Appeal from Order is itself disposed of, he does

                       not want to press the instant contempt petition.

                       3.          Accordingly, the contempt petition is disposed of.



                                                            (PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.)


                                                           1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.