Bombay High Court
BHIKKAN SARDAR TADVIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The contempt petition is disposed of as the direction to pass the award has been complied with.
Summary
The petitioner, Bhikkan Sardar Tadvi, filed a contempt petition challenging the State of Maharashtra for allegedly failing to pass a mandated award. The High Court had earlier directed the award to be passed, and the petitioner sought enforcement through contempt proceedings. The court observed that the award has now been passed, thereby satisfying the earlier direction. Consequently, the court held that the basis for the contempt petition no longer existed. The judges therefore ordered the contempt petition to be disposed. No further relief was granted to either party.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate disposition of a contempt petition when the direction that gave rise to the contempt allegation has been complied with?
Subjects
- contempt
- award
- compliance
- high court
- petition disposed
Judgment
905 cp 14-20 .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
905 CONT. PETITION NO. 14 OF 2020
IN WP/13959/2017
BHIKKAN SARDAR TADVI
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...
Mr. Gaikwad Dnyaneshwar B., Advocate for the Petitioner
Ms. Uma S. Bhosale, AGP for Respondent-State
….
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE &
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.
Date : 24/09/2026
PER COURT :
1. Heard.
2. The direction was for passing of the award, which has now
been passed. In view of the same, the order under contempt
appears to have been complied with. Accordingly, the contempt
petition stands disposed of.
[VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE]
JUDGE JUDGE
VS Maind/ Page|1
Checking your session…