Bombay High Court

SOU. REVATI KUSHA WAGH AND ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR, THR. THE SECRETARY AND ANR.

Disposal: Disposed Off

Holding

The contempt petitions are disposed of as not pressed.

Summary

The petitioners filed contempt petitions alleging that the State of Maharashtra had failed to comply with a judgment and order dated 9 March 2017. The petitioners’ counsel stated he had no instructions in the matters. The Court examined the petitions and found that the petitioners’ grievances had been addressed. Consequently, the Court held that the contempt petitions were not pressed. The petitions were therefore disposed of. No further orders were made.

Issues considered

Whether the alleged non‑compliance with the 9 March 2017 judgment amounts to contempt of court
Whether the contempt petitions are maintainable

Subjects

contempt
non‑compliance
judgment enforcement
civil appellate jurisdiction

Judgment

                                                          52 CP-344-2018(C).doc


                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                         CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                         CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                   CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 344 OF 2018
Shanti Satyavijay Pawaskar and Another.                   ...Petitioners.
        Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Another.                     ...Respondents.

                                 WITH
                   CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 149 OF 2018
Revati Kusha Wagh and Another.                            ...Petitioners.
        Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Another.                     ...Respondents.
                            ——————
Mr. Sagar Mane for the Petitioner.
Mr. Siddheshwar B. Kalel, AGP for the Respondent-State.
                                  ——————
                                    Coram :    Sharmila U. Deshmukh &
                                               Neeraj P. Dhote, JJ.
                                    Date     : September 8, 2026.
P. C. :

1.         Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners would submit that

he has no instructions in the matters.

2.         Perusal of the contempt petitions would indicate that allegations

are with regard to non compliance of judgment and order dated 9 th

March 2017. It appears that Petitioners’ grievances are addressed. In

view thereof, the contempt petitions stand disposed of as not pressed.



 [Neeraj P. Dhote, J.]                          [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]




Patil-SR                            1 of 1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…