Bombay High Court

TRIMBAK ANANDA DAFALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The petition is disposed as there is nothing left to adjudicate after compliance with the contempt order.

Summary

The petitioner, Trimbak Ananda Dafal, filed a contempt petition (No. 160 of 2020) arising out of Writ Petition No. 7293 of 2019, alleging non-compliance with a contempt order. The petitioner was represented by Mr. P.B. Salunke, appearing on behalf of Mr. V.G. Salgare. The respondent State of Maharashtra was represented by Mr. G.A. Kulkarni. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the order under contempt had been fully complied with. The Court, after noting the compliance, held that there was nothing left to adjudicate and consequently disposed of the petition. The judgment was delivered by Judges Sandipkumar C. More and Vaishali Patil-Jadhav on 28 September 2026.

Issues considered

Whether the contempt petition should continue after the petitioner’s compliance with the contempt order

Subjects

contempt
writ petition
compliance
disposal
high court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:44682-DB

                                                                       160.20CP

                                              1

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                           6 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.160 OF 2020
                             IN WRIT PETITION NO.7293 OF 2019

                                   TRIMBAK ANANDA DAFAL
                                            VERSUS
                          THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS
                                                ...
                          Advocate for the petitioner : Mr.P.B.Salunke
                                       h/f.Mr.V.G.Salgare
                          AGP for Respondent-State : Mr.G.A.Kulkarni
                                                …
                                     CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE &
                                                    VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ.

                                    DATE      :   28.09.2026
                 P.C. :


                 1]         The learned counsel holding for Mr.V.G.Salgare,

                 learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits

                 that the order under contempt is complied with.



                 2]         In view of the same, nothing survives in the

                 present petition and the same stands disposed of.




                 [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV]           [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE]
                         JUDGE                          JUDGE

                 DDC

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…