Bombay High Court
MANJUSHA CHANDRAKANT SUDAMEversusBHAGIRATHI STREE SHIKSHAN SANSTHA AURANGABAD AND ORS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The contempt petition was disposed of as withdrawn upon the petitioner's request.
Summary
Manjusha Chandrakant Sudame filed a contempt petition against Bhagirati Stree Shikshan Sanstha and others. The petitioner later wrote a letter dated 22.08.2026 stating that he had retired from service and no longer had any grievance against the institution, and therefore wished to withdraw the petition. The petitioner's counsel presented the letter before the bench. The court recorded the letter and, finding no objection, ordered the contempt petition to be disposed of as withdrawn. No further hearing was required.
Issues considered
- Whether a contempt petition can be withdrawn by the petitioner after filing
Subjects
- contempt petition
- withdrawal
- retirement
- high court
- petition disposed
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:43391
1 903 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 162 OF 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
903 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 162 OF 2009
IN WP/3093/2000
MANJUSHA CHANDRAKANT SUDAME
VERSUS
BHAGIRATHI STREE SHIKSHAN SANSTHA AURANGABAD AND
ORS
…
Adv. M. N. Kalyane h/f Adv. G.B. Rajale, Advocate for the Petitioner
Adv. S. J. Salgare, AGP for Respondents-State
Adv. Raksha Chaudhari h/f Adv. S. S. Choudhari, Advocate for
Respondent No.6.
...
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.
DATED : 22/09/2026
Order: ( Per Vaishali Patil-Jadhav, J. )
. The learned counsel holding for Mr. Rajale has placed on
record letter dated 22.08.2026 addressed to the advocate by the
petitioner stating that the contempt petition may be withdrawn as
he has retired from the service and he has no grievance against the
institution. The said letter is taken on record and marked “X” for
identification.
2. In view of the same, the Contempt Petition is disposed as
withdrawn.
( VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. ) ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. )
shivani/
Checking your session…