Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MOHANLAL ARJUNDAS SHAMNANIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The publication of the Revised Development Plan on 27‑09‑2013 complied with the contempt order, leading to its disposal.

Summary

Mohanlal Arjundas Shamnani filed a contempt petition against the State of Maharashtra alleging non‑compliance with a court order to submit the Revised Development Plan. The court had directed Respondent No. 4 to submit the plan to the State Government for sanction. The Additional Government Pleader submitted that the Revised Development Plan under Section 31 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 was published on 27‑09‑2013. The court held that this publication satisfied the contempt order. Consequently, the contempt petition was disposed of as the order was complied with.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Revised Development Plan was submitted and published as required by the contempt order
  • Whether compliance with the order under Section 31 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 suffices to discharge the contempt

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • contempt of court
  • development plan
  • Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act
  • compliance
  • order disposal

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:41576

                                                         903 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 167 OF 2012




                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                            903 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 167 OF 2012
                                      IN WP/6665/2010

                                        Mohanlal Arjundas Shamnani
                                                   Versus
                                    The State Of Maharashtra And Others
                     __________________________________________________________
                       • Adv. R. R. Sancheti for the Petitioner
                       • Mr. A. S. Shinde, Addl.G.P. for State
                       • Adv. S. D. Hiwrekar for Respondent No. 5 - Absent
                     __________________________________________________________

                                       CORAM     : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
                                                   VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

                                       DATE      : SEPTEMBER 08, 2026


                     ORDER : [PER VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.]

                     1)             In the order under contempt, statement was
                     made by Respondent No. 4 that the Revised Development
                     Plan would be submitted to the State Government and
                     thereafter it will be sanctioned as early as possible.

                     2)             Learned Addl.G.P. submits that the Revised
                     Development Plan under Section 31 of Maharashtra
                     Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 is published on
                     27.09.2013.

                     3)             As such, the order under contempt is complied
                     with and the same stands disposed of.


                     (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV)           (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
                               JUDGE                           JUDGE

                     Komal Kamble                                               Page| 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.