Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHAIKH MUBASHIRUDDIN VAZRIRODDINversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ORS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

A contempt petition that has become infructuous must be disposed of.

Summary

Shaikh Mubashiruddin Vazriddin filed a contempt petition (No. 173 of 2011) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, against the State of Maharashtra and others. During the proceedings, the petitioner's counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous. The Court considered whether a petition that is no longer capable of being pursued should continue. Relying on the principle that an infructuous petition cannot be entertained, the Court held that it must be disposed of. Consequently, the petition was ordered to stand disposed as infructuous.

Issues considered

  • Whether the contempt petition, having become infructuous, should be dismissed

Subjects

  • contempt
  • infructuous petition
  • dismissal
  • High Court
  • procedural law

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:42530


                                          1                  902 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 173 OF 2011



                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                  BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                           902 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 173 OF 2011
                                     IN WP/1446/2010

                         SHAIKH MUBASHIRUDDIN VAZRIRODDIN
                                          VERSUS
                               THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS
                                             ...
            Adv. M. S. Choudhary, Advocate for the Petitioner
            Adv. S. J. Salgare, AGP for Respondents-State
            Adv. A. B. Kharosekar, Advocate for Respondent No.3
                                             ...

                                     CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
                                             VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

                                     DATED : 11/09/2026
                ORDER ( Per Vaishali Patil-Jadhav, J. ) :-

            .          The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

            contempt petition has become infructuous.

            2.         In view of the same, the petition stands disposed of as

            infructuous.




            ( VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. ) ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. )

            shivani/


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.