Bombay High Court

APANG SAHAYYA SENA, AURANGABADversusSIDHARTH KHARAT AND OTHERS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The court held that the order under contempt was complied with and therefore dismissed the contempt petition.

Summary

The Apang Sahayya Sena filed a contempt petition against Sidharth Kharat and others alleging non‑compliance with a court direction to issue an advertisement for disabled persons. The respondents, through their counsel, submitted that the advertisement was issued on 16 April 2015 and provided copies of the requisition and communications with the Commission. The court examined the reply and the attached documents. Finding that the direction had indeed been complied with, the court held that there was no contempt. Consequently, the petition was disposed of.

Issues considered

Whether the order directing issuance of advertisement for disabled persons was complied with, thereby negating contempt.

Subjects

contempt
disability rights
advertisement
compliance
court order

Judgment

                                     (1)
                                                         907 CP-191.2015.odt
     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                BENCH AT AURANGABAD

         907 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 191 OF 2015
                   IN WP/3799/2014

              APANG SAHAYYA SENA, AURANGABAD
                          VERSUS
                SIDHARTH KHARAT AND OTHERS

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                         None for the petitioner.
                 Mrs. Uma Bhosale, A.G.P. for State.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

                    CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
                            VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

                    DATED       : 1st October, 2026

Per Court :

1.    None for the petitioner.

2.    Learned APP, by pointing out the reply, submits that the

direction for issuance of advertisement for the disabled

persons has already been issued on 16 th April 2015.                    The

copies of requisition from the disabled persons and the

communication of the Commission with Government are also

attached alongwith the reply.

3.    As such, it appears that the order under contempt is

complied with, and therefore, the petition stands disposed of.



(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV)                    (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
       JUDGE                                       JUDGE
VD_Dhirde

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…