Bombay High Court
SANTOSH BABASAHE AATOLEversusSUIL KENDREKAR AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The petition was held to be infructuous and was dismissed.
Summary
The petitioner, Santosh Babasahe Aatole, filed a contempt petition challenging transfer orders issued for the academic years 2018‑2019 and 2019‑2020. The petition alleged that the orders were illegal and sought relief. The Court examined whether the petition remained viable given the passage of time. It held that the subject matter had become infructuous because the academic periods in question had already elapsed. Consequently, the Court found no live issue to adjudicate. The petition was therefore disposed of without any further order.
Issues considered
- Whether a contempt petition challenging transfer orders remains maintainable after the relevant academic periods have elapsed
Subjects
- contempt petition
- transfer orders
- infructuous
- academic year
- petition dismissed
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:44684-DB
198.20CP
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
9 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 198 OF 2020
IN WRIT PETITION NO.5589 OF 2018
SANTOSH BABASAHE AATOLE
VERSUS
SUIL KENDREKAR & OTHERS
...
AGP for Respondent-State : Mr.A.S.Shinde
...
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE &
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ.
DATE : 28.09.2026
P.C. :
1] None for the petitioner.
2] It appears that the petitioner is having grievance
about transfer orders for the academic year 2018-2019 and
also 2019-2020. However, by the passage of time, the subject
matter has become infructuous, and therefore, nothing
survives in the present petition and the same stands
disposed of.
[VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE]
JUDGE JUDGE
DDC
Checking your session…