Bombay High Court

NAVNATH JAGNNATH MASKE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHRASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

Since the petitioners have already received the enhanced compensation, the continuation petitions stand disposed.

Summary

The Aurangabad Bench of the High Court of Bombay heard a series of continuation petitions (Nos. 184, 186, 187, 188, 189 and 200 of 2020) filed by various petitioners against the State of Maharashtra. All petitioners alleged that they were entitled to enhanced compensation. The petitioners, through their counsel, informed the Court that they had already received the enhanced compensation. The Court examined whether any relief remained to be granted. Finding that the relief sought had already been satisfied, the Court held that there was nothing left to adjudicate. Consequently, all the continuation petitions were ordered to stand disposed.

Issues considered

Whether the continuation petitions remain maintainable after the petitioners have already received the enhanced compensation?

Subjects

compensation
petition disposal
continuation petition
high court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:37444-DB

                                                                    902 to 907 184-20 .




                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                             BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                         902 CONT. PETITION NO. 184 OF 2020
                                    IN WP/11891/2019
                            SUNIL SUDAM PARVE AND OTHERS
                                         VERSUS
                       THE STATE OF MAHRASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                            ...
          Mr. Tungar Hrishikesh V. , Advocate for the Petitioners
          Mr. A. S. Shinde, AGP for Respondent-State
                                            ….
                                           AND
                         903 CONT. PETITION NO. 186 OF 2020
                                    IN WP/11887/2019

                       SITARAM SHRIMANT MASKE AND ANOTHER
                                          VERSUS
                        THE STATE OF MAHRASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                             ...
          Mr. Tungar Hrishikesh V., Advocate for the Petitioners
          Mr. S. J. Salgare, AGP for Respondent-State
                                            …
                                           AND
                          904 CONT. PETITION NO. 187 OF 2020
                                     IN WP/11888/2019

                       MADHUKAR ASHRUBA MASKE AND OTHERS
                                          VERSUS
                       THE STATE OF MAHRASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                             ...
          Mr. Tungar Hrishikesh V. , Advocate for the Petitioners
          Mr. N. B. Patil, AGP for Respondent-State
                                             …
                                            AND
                           905 CONT. PETITION NO. 188 OF 2020
                                     IN WP/11889/2019
                    SHRIHARI YASHWANTRAO YEWALE AND ANOTHER
                                          VERSUS
                      THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                             ...
          Mr. Tungar Hrishikesh V. , Advocate for the Petitioners
          Ms. Uma S. Bhosale, AGP for Respondent-State
                                             …
                  VS Maind/                                     Page|1
                                                                 902 to 907 184-20 .




                                   AND
                    906 CONT. PETITION NO. 189 OF 2020
                            IN WP/11886/2019

                   SHAHURAO BABURAO KOLHE
                               VERSUS
            THE STATE OF MAHRASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                  ...
Mr. Tungar Hrishikesh V. , Advocate for the Petitioners
Ms. M. N. Ghanekar AGP for Respondent-State
                                  …
                                 AND
              907 CONT. PETITION NO. 200 OF 2020
                         IN WP/11890/2019

             NAVNATH JAGNNATH MASKE AND OTHERS
                               VERSUS
             THE STATE OF MAHRASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                  ...
Mr. Tungar Hrishikesh V. , Advocate for the Petitioners
Mr. G. A. Kulkarni, AGP for Respondent-State
                                  ...
                       CORAM         : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE &
                                        VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

                           Date       :   19/08/2026

PER COURT :


     Learned counsel for the petitioners in all these petitions, on
instructions, submits that the petitioners have already received the
amount of enhanced compensation. As such, nothing survives in these
petitions. Accordingly, all these petitions stand disposed of.




[VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV]                       [SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE]
             JUDGE                                  JUDGE


        VS Maind/                                            Page|2

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…