Bombay High Court
RAHUL S/O VIKRAM BAGALversusMR. ASEEMKUMAR GUPTA
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The petition is disposed as there is nothing left to adjudicate after compliance with the order under contempt.
Summary
The petitioner, Rahul, filed a contempt petition challenging the reservation of a disputed land. The petitioner’s counsel submitted a Government Resolution dated 28 July 2026 along with the corresponding order, indicating that the order under contempt had been complied with. The court examined the compliance documents and found that the relief sought in the petition was no longer necessary. Consequently, the court held that there was nothing left to adjudicate. The petition was therefore disposed of with no further orders.
Issues considered
- What is the effect of compliance with the order under contempt on the pending petition?
Subjects
- contempt
- land reservation
- petition disposal
- compliance
- High Court of Bombay
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:38938-DB
1 904 CONT. PETITION NO. 200 OF 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
904 CONT. PETITION NO. 200 OF 2026
IN WP/8066/2009
RAHUL S/O VIKRAM BAGAL
VERSUS
MR. ASEEMKUMAR GUPTA
…..
Adv. S. A. Wakure, Advocate for the Petitioner
Adv. M. N. Ghanekar, AGP for Respondents-State
Adv. A. N. Barhate Patil h/f Adv. V. B. Deshmukh, Advocate for
Respondent No. 5
…..
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.
DATED : 27/08/2026
Per Court:
. The learned counsel for the petitioner placed on record the
Government Resolution dated 28.07.2026 along with the order of
the same date in respect of the reservation of the disputed land.
The same is taken on record and marked “X” for identification. The
learned counsel for the petitioner, thus, submitted that the order
under contempt is complied with.
2. In view of the same, nothing survives in this petition.
Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of.
( VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. ) ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. )
shivani/
Checking your session…