Bombay High Court
M/S RAJMUDRA REAL ESTATE PVT LTD MUMBAI BRANCH JALGAON THROUGH DIRECTORversusSWADHEEN SHIVRAJ KSHATRIYA AND ORS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The contempt petition was dismissed as there was no surviving cause of contempt after the disposal of the main writ petition.
Summary
M/s. Rajmudra Real Estate Pvt Ltd. filed a contempt petition (No. 206 of 2012) arising out of Writ Petition No. 4792 of 2011. The petitioner argued that the main writ petition had been disposed, leaving no surviving cause of contempt. The Court examined whether the contempt petition could continue in the absence of the underlying writ. Finding that the disposal of the main writ eliminated any basis for contempt, the Court held that there was nothing left to adjudicate. Consequently, the contempt petition was dismissed.
Issues considered
- Can a contempt petition continue when the underlying writ petition has been disposed?
Subjects
- contempt
- writ petition
- disposal
- procedural law
- jurisdiction
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:42234
206.12CP
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
906 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.206 OF 2012
IN WRIT PETITION NO.4792 OF 2011
M/S.RAJMUDRA REAL ESTATE PVT LTD.MUMBAI
VERSUS
SWADHEEN SHIVRAJ KSHATRIYA & OTHERS
...
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr.A.D.Soman h/f. Mr.Sandeep
S. Deshmukh
AGP for Respondent-State : Mrs.M.N.Ghanekar
…
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE &
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ.
DATE : 10.09.2026
ORDER : [PER : VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,J.]
1] Mr.A.D.Soman, learned Advocate holding for
Mr.Sandeep S. Deshmukh, learned Advocate for the
petitioner submits that in view of disposal of the main Writ
Petition, nothing survives in the present Contempt Petition.
2] In view of the same, the Contempt Petition is
disposed of.
[VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE]
JUDGE JUDGE
DDC
Checking your session…