Bombay High Court
Jubedabi Ismail Korbu Since deceased through his Lrs Rafiq Ismail Korbu and Ors.versusRaghunath Kalidas Mahamuni Since deceased through his Lrs Shalini Raghunath Mahamuni and Ors.
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The contempt petition is disposed of as the mutation entries have been restored in compliance with the Court's earlier order.
Summary
The petitioners filed a contempt petition alleging that the respondents had defied the Court's order dated 11 September 2026 by altering mutation entries in land records. The petitioners claimed that the mutation entries were restored to include their names due to supervening events. The Court was informed by counsel that the entries had indeed been restored, thereby complying with the earlier order. In view of this compliance, the Court found no basis to examine the conduct of the respondents further. Consequently, the contempt petition was dismissed and the matter was closed.
Issues considered
- Whether the respondents' alteration of mutation entries constituted contempt of the Court's order dated 11 September 2026
- Whether the restoration of the mutation entries obviated the need for further inquiry into the respondents' conduct
Subjects
- contempt
- mutation
- land records
- court order compliance
- civil procedure
Judgment
504 CP 212 26.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
504 CONT. PETITION NO. 212 OF 2026
JUBEDABI ISMAIL KORBU SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HIS LRS RAFIQ
ISMAIL KORBU AND ORS.
VERSUS
RAGHUNATH KALIDAS MAHAMUNI SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HIS LRS
SHALINI RAGHUNATH MAHAMUNI AND ORS.
...
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Ashok Bharat Tajane a/w Adv. Sanket
S.Rajmane
A.G.P. for Respondent nos. 5 to 10 : Mr. Sanjay D. Rayrikar
...
CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.
DATE : 01.10.2026
PER COURT :
Learned counsel Mr. Tajane for the petitioners informs this Court that
by supervening events, the mutation entries, which are carried out in
defiance of the orders passed by this Court on 11.09.2026 have been
restored incorporating names of the petitioners. There is no need to
examine the conduct of the respondents.
2. The Contempt Petition is disposed of.
( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.)
mkd/-
1/1
Checking your session…