Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

Jubedabi Ismail Korbu Since deceased through his Lrs Rafiq Ismail Korbu and Ors.versusRaghunath Kalidas Mahamuni Since deceased through his Lrs Shalini Raghunath Mahamuni and Ors.

Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The contempt petition is disposed of as the mutation entries have been restored in compliance with the Court's earlier order.

Summary

The petitioners filed a contempt petition alleging that the respondents had defied the Court's order dated 11 September 2026 by altering mutation entries in land records. The petitioners claimed that the mutation entries were restored to include their names due to supervening events. The Court was informed by counsel that the entries had indeed been restored, thereby complying with the earlier order. In view of this compliance, the Court found no basis to examine the conduct of the respondents further. Consequently, the contempt petition was dismissed and the matter was closed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the respondents' alteration of mutation entries constituted contempt of the Court's order dated 11 September 2026
  • Whether the restoration of the mutation entries obviated the need for further inquiry into the respondents' conduct

Subjects

  • contempt
  • mutation
  • land records
  • court order compliance
  • civil procedure

Judgment

                                                                 504 CP 212 26.odt

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                      CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                     CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                    504 CONT. PETITION NO. 212 OF 2026

 JUBEDABI ISMAIL KORBU SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HIS LRS RAFIQ
                        ISMAIL KORBU AND ORS.
                                 VERSUS
RAGHUNATH KALIDAS MAHAMUNI SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HIS LRS
            SHALINI RAGHUNATH MAHAMUNI AND ORS.
                                    ...
   Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Ashok Bharat Tajane a/w Adv. Sanket
                                S.Rajmane
      A.G.P. for Respondent nos. 5 to 10 : Mr. Sanjay D. Rayrikar
                                    ...

                       CORAM               :    SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.

                       DATE                : 01.10.2026


PER COURT :

         Learned counsel Mr. Tajane for the petitioners informs this Court that
by supervening events, the mutation entries, which are carried out in
defiance of the orders passed by this Court on 11.09.2026 have been
restored incorporating names of the petitioners.        There is no need to
examine the conduct of the respondents.

2.      The Contempt Petition is disposed of.



                                       ( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.)




mkd/-




                                                                              1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.