Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

Kavita Yogesh BehlversusShobha Kishore Kadam

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The contempt petitions and the related writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Several writ petitions were filed by different petitioners against various respondents, seeking relief that was ultimately dismissed by the trial court and upheld by the Supreme Court. In response, the petitioners filed contempt petitions alleging non‑compliance with the court's orders. The petitioners, however, chose not to pursue the contempt petitions after the Supreme Court’s affirmation of the dismissal of the writ petitions. Justice Arun R. Pedneker, hearing the matter, ordered that all contempt petitions and the associated writ petitions be dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, any interim applications filed in these matters were also deemed to have no further existence and were disposed of. The order effectively closed all pending proceedings in the batch of cases.

Issues considered

  • Whether the contempt petitions should proceed when the underlying writ petitions have been dismissed and the dismissal upheld by the Supreme Court

Subjects

  • contempt
  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • dismissal
  • High Court
  • Supreme Court

Judgment

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                          CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                           CONTEMPT PETITION NO.216 OF 2025
                                                         IN
BHALCHANDRA                                 WRIT PETITION NO. 17959 OF 2024
GOPAL
DUSANE

Digitally signed by
BHALCHANDRA
GOPAL DUSANE
Date: 2026.08.20
11:55:41 +0530
                      Kavita Yogesh Behl             ....    Petitioner
                                 Vs.
                      Shobha Kishore Kadam           ....    Respondent

                                                        WITH
                                           CONTEMPT PETITION NO.220 OF 2025
                                                         IN
                                            WRIT PETITION NO. 17956 OF 2024


                      Shamrao Hiraman Fuge           ....    Petitioner
                                  Vs.
                      Shivajirao Ganpatrao Kadam     ....    Respondent

                                                        WITH
                                           CONTEMPT PETITION NO.219 OF 2025
                                                         IN
                                            WRIT PETITION NO. 17958 OF 2024


                      Kavita Yogesh Behl             ....    Petitioner
                                 Vs.
                      Chhaya Shivajirao Kadam        ....    Respondent

                                                        WITH
                                           CONTEMPT PETITION NO.221 OF 2025
                                                         IN
                                            WRIT PETITION NO. 17957 OF 2024


                      Rajesh Mangesh Behl            ....    Petitioner
                                 Vs.
                                                            1/2
                      10 CP 216.25 group.doc                                  Dusane
Rajshree Sudhir Kadam            ....    Respondent


Mr. Niranjan Bhavake a/w Ms. Vaishnavi i/b Bhavake & Associates for
Petitioners.
Mr. Girish Godbole, Senior Advocate i/b Mr. Kaustubh Thipsay for
Respondents.

                                 CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.
                                 DATE   : 18th August 2026

P.C. :


1.       Learned counsel does not press the Contempt Petitions in view of the

dismissal of the Writ Petition, which order has been upheld by the Supreme

Court.

2.       All Contempt Petitions and Writ Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.

3.       In view of dismissal of the Contempt Petitions and Writ Petitions,

Interim Applications, if any, do not survive, the same are also disposed of.



                                                 [ ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. ]




                                        2/2
10 CP 216.25 group.doc                                                Dusane


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.